Influence of Utterance Strategies to Get Closer Psychologically on Evaluation of Dialogue in a Non-task-oriented Dialogue System

T. Miyamoto, Motoki Iwashita, Mizuki Endo, Nozomu Nagai, D. Katagami
{"title":"Influence of Utterance Strategies to Get Closer Psychologically on Evaluation of Dialogue in a Non-task-oriented Dialogue System","authors":"T. Miyamoto, Motoki Iwashita, Mizuki Endo, Nozomu Nagai, D. Katagami","doi":"10.1527/TJSAI.36-5_AG21-I","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"a user. On the other hand, individual differences in acceptability to utterances to get closer psychologically are considered to be large. In particular, we believe that the personality characteristics of the user affect the acceptability of utterances to get closer psychologically. So, we set research question 1: “How do user personality traits affect the acceptability of a non-task-oriented dialogue system with utterances get closer psychologically?” Also, utterances get closer psychologically has the risk of making the interlocutor uncomfortable. Therefore, in considering the implementation of utterances gets closer psychologically in a dialogue system, it is useful to examine how different strategies of utterances get closer psychologically affect the acceptability of a chatting dialogue system. So, we set research question 2: “How do different utterance strategies to get closer psychologically affect the acceptability of chatting dialogue systems?” To discuss these research questions, we conducted a dialogue experiment using a rule-based non-task-oriented dialogue system (n = 82). The results showed that for RQ1, among the five personality characteristics targeted in this experiment, the user’s diligence was related to the evaluation of the non-task-oriented dialogue system for utterance strategies to get closer psychologically used in this experiment in the subjective index, and extroversion, neurotic tendency, and openness in the objective index (likability based on user utterances). For research question 2, the experimental results showed that the acceptability between utterance strategies to get closer psychologically was significantly different in the viewpoint of the subjective index. These findings contribute to the design of a non-task-oriented dialogue system.","PeriodicalId":23256,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1527/TJSAI.36-5_AG21-I","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

a user. On the other hand, individual differences in acceptability to utterances to get closer psychologically are considered to be large. In particular, we believe that the personality characteristics of the user affect the acceptability of utterances to get closer psychologically. So, we set research question 1: “How do user personality traits affect the acceptability of a non-task-oriented dialogue system with utterances get closer psychologically?” Also, utterances get closer psychologically has the risk of making the interlocutor uncomfortable. Therefore, in considering the implementation of utterances gets closer psychologically in a dialogue system, it is useful to examine how different strategies of utterances get closer psychologically affect the acceptability of a chatting dialogue system. So, we set research question 2: “How do different utterance strategies to get closer psychologically affect the acceptability of chatting dialogue systems?” To discuss these research questions, we conducted a dialogue experiment using a rule-based non-task-oriented dialogue system (n = 82). The results showed that for RQ1, among the five personality characteristics targeted in this experiment, the user’s diligence was related to the evaluation of the non-task-oriented dialogue system for utterance strategies to get closer psychologically used in this experiment in the subjective index, and extroversion, neurotic tendency, and openness in the objective index (likability based on user utterances). For research question 2, the experimental results showed that the acceptability between utterance strategies to get closer psychologically was significantly different in the viewpoint of the subjective index. These findings contribute to the design of a non-task-oriented dialogue system.
非任务导向对话系统中话语策略对对话评价的心理影响
用户。另一方面,为了在心理上更接近,个体对话语的可接受性差异很大。特别是,我们认为用户的个性特征会影响话语的可接受性,从而在心理上更接近。因此,我们提出了研究问题1:“当话语在心理上越来越近时,用户的性格特征如何影响非任务导向对话系统的可接受性?”此外,言语在心理上变得越来越近有让对话者感到不舒服的风险。因此,在考虑话语在对话系统中的心理接近程度时,研究不同的话语策略在心理上接近程度如何影响聊天对话系统的可接受性是有用的。因此,我们设置了研究问题2:“在心理上拉近距离的不同话语策略如何影响聊天对话系统的可接受性?”为了讨论这些研究问题,我们使用基于规则的非任务导向对话系统进行了对话实验(n=82)。结果表明,对于RQ1,在本实验所针对的五种人格特征中,用户的勤奋程度与非任务导向对话系统对本实验中心理上使用的话语策略的评价有关,以及客观指数中的开放性(基于用户话语的喜爱度)。对于研究问题2,实验结果表明,从主观指标的角度来看,两种接近心理的话语策略的可接受性存在显著差异。这些发现有助于设计一个不以任务为导向的对话系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transactions of The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence
Transactions of The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence Computer Science-Artificial Intelligence
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信