Something went missing: cessation of Traditional Owner land management and rapid mammalian population collapses in the semi-arid region of the Murray–Darling Basin, southeastern Australia

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
I. Mansergh, D. Cheal, J. Burch, H. Allen
{"title":"Something went missing: cessation of Traditional Owner land management and rapid mammalian population collapses in the semi-arid region of the Murray–Darling Basin, southeastern Australia","authors":"I. Mansergh, D. Cheal, J. Burch, H. Allen","doi":"10.1071/rs22002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nineteenth century mass mammal extinctions in the semi-arid zone of the Murray‒Darling basin, southeastern Australia, are examined in the context of prior traditional land management. A model of grassland dynamics reveals a multi-trophic level productive pulse one to five years post-fire, followed by senescence and increasing flammability. Traditional Owner patch burning of grassland optimized human and mammalian food (including tubers, seeds and fungi) and decreased fire risk. Over at least 40 000 years, the persistence and abundance of fauna responded to this energetically closed self-reinforcing management. In 1830, depopulation (disease, massacres and displacement) effectively ended traditional management, an ecologically traumatic event that extinguished these productivity pulses. Associated mammal populations of c. 20 species collapsed, and all eco-engineering and mycophagous species, such as bilbies, bettongs and bandicoots, rapidly disappeared. Traditional land management increased productivity, habitat heterogeneity and reduced wildfire risk, underpinning mammal abundance. This has remained unrecognized by most mammalogists and land managers. Blaming extinctions predominantly on the additions by Europeans (introduction of ungulates, feral grazers and predators etc.), disastrous as they were, fails to acknowledge the initial cause of rarity, i.e. loss of productivity, habitat and niches when traditional management was subtracted from country. As ecosystems continue to degrade, understanding the primary cause is fundamental to improved management. Although too late for extinct species, respect for, and inclusion of, traditional land management knowledge provides a direction for future land management.","PeriodicalId":35916,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/rs22002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The nineteenth century mass mammal extinctions in the semi-arid zone of the Murray‒Darling basin, southeastern Australia, are examined in the context of prior traditional land management. A model of grassland dynamics reveals a multi-trophic level productive pulse one to five years post-fire, followed by senescence and increasing flammability. Traditional Owner patch burning of grassland optimized human and mammalian food (including tubers, seeds and fungi) and decreased fire risk. Over at least 40 000 years, the persistence and abundance of fauna responded to this energetically closed self-reinforcing management. In 1830, depopulation (disease, massacres and displacement) effectively ended traditional management, an ecologically traumatic event that extinguished these productivity pulses. Associated mammal populations of c. 20 species collapsed, and all eco-engineering and mycophagous species, such as bilbies, bettongs and bandicoots, rapidly disappeared. Traditional land management increased productivity, habitat heterogeneity and reduced wildfire risk, underpinning mammal abundance. This has remained unrecognized by most mammalogists and land managers. Blaming extinctions predominantly on the additions by Europeans (introduction of ungulates, feral grazers and predators etc.), disastrous as they were, fails to acknowledge the initial cause of rarity, i.e. loss of productivity, habitat and niches when traditional management was subtracted from country. As ecosystems continue to degrade, understanding the primary cause is fundamental to improved management. Although too late for extinct species, respect for, and inclusion of, traditional land management knowledge provides a direction for future land management.
缺少了一些东西:澳大利亚东南部墨累-达令盆地半干旱地区传统所有者土地管理的停止和哺乳动物种群的迅速崩溃
19世纪澳大利亚东南部墨累-达令盆地半干旱地区的大规模哺乳动物灭绝是在先前传统土地管理的背景下进行研究的。草原动力学模型揭示了火灾后一到五年的多营养级生产脉冲,随后是衰老和可燃性增加。传统的草原所有者斑块焚烧优化了人类和哺乳动物的食物(包括块茎、种子和真菌),降低了火灾风险。在至少4万年的时间里,动物群的持久性和丰富性对这种充满活力的封闭自我强化管理做出了回应。1830年,人口减少(疾病、屠杀和流离失所)有效地结束了传统管理,这是一个生态创伤事件,扼杀了这些生产力脉冲。大约20个物种的相关哺乳动物种群崩溃,所有生态工程和噬菌物种,如毕尔巴鄂、斗鱼和土匪,都迅速消失。传统的土地管理提高了生产力、栖息地的异质性并降低了野火风险,为哺乳动物的丰富提供了基础。大多数哺乳动物学家和土地管理者仍然没有认识到这一点。将物种灭绝主要归咎于欧洲人的增加(引入有蹄类动物、野生食草动物和捕食者等),尽管它们是灾难性的,但没有认识到稀有性的最初原因,即当从国家中减去传统管理时,生产力、栖息地和生态位的丧失。随着生态系统不断退化,了解主要原因对于改善管理至关重要。尽管对灭绝物种来说为时已晚,但对传统土地管理知识的尊重和包容为未来的土地管理提供了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The Royal Society of Victoria has been an active and vital part of Melbourne"s scientific heritage since 1854. Membership is open to anyone interested in science and the promotion of science. Located in the heart of Melbourne, the Society"s Hall at 9 Victoria Street is the venue for an interesting program of scientific lectures, symposia and events to promote the sciences to the Victoria and Australian community. These lectures are open to the public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信