Agenda divergence in a developing conflict: Quantitative evidence from Ukrainian and Russian TV newsfeeds

IF 1.7 Q2 COMMUNICATION
O. Koltsova, Sergei Pashakhin
{"title":"Agenda divergence in a developing conflict: Quantitative evidence from Ukrainian and Russian TV newsfeeds","authors":"O. Koltsova, Sergei Pashakhin","doi":"10.1177/1750635219829876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although conflict representation in media has been widely studied, few attempts have been made to perform large-scale comparisons of agendas in the media of conflicting parties, especially for armed country-level confrontations. In this article, the authors introduce quantitative evidence of agenda divergence between the media of conflicting parties in the course of the Ukrainian crisis 2013–2014. Using 45,000 messages from the online newsfeeds of a Russian and a Ukrainian TV channel, they perform topic modelling coupled with qualitative analysis to reveal crisis-related topics, assess their salience and map evolution of attention of both channels to each of those topics. They find that the two channels produce fundamentally different agenda sequences. Based on the Ukrainian case, they offer a typology of conflict media coverage stages.","PeriodicalId":45719,"journal":{"name":"Media War and Conflict","volume":"13 1","pages":"237 - 257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1750635219829876","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media War and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219829876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Although conflict representation in media has been widely studied, few attempts have been made to perform large-scale comparisons of agendas in the media of conflicting parties, especially for armed country-level confrontations. In this article, the authors introduce quantitative evidence of agenda divergence between the media of conflicting parties in the course of the Ukrainian crisis 2013–2014. Using 45,000 messages from the online newsfeeds of a Russian and a Ukrainian TV channel, they perform topic modelling coupled with qualitative analysis to reveal crisis-related topics, assess their salience and map evolution of attention of both channels to each of those topics. They find that the two channels produce fundamentally different agenda sequences. Based on the Ukrainian case, they offer a typology of conflict media coverage stages.
发展中的冲突中的议程分歧:来自乌克兰和俄罗斯电视新闻源的定量证据
尽管对媒体中的冲突表现进行了广泛研究,但很少有人试图对冲突各方的媒体议程进行大规模比较,尤其是在国家一级的武装对抗中。在这篇文章中,作者介绍了2013-2014年乌克兰危机期间冲突各方媒体之间议程分歧的定量证据。他们使用俄罗斯和乌克兰电视频道的45000条在线新闻推送信息,进行主题建模和定性分析,以揭示与危机相关的主题,评估其显著性,并绘制两个频道对每一个主题的关注度演变图。他们发现,这两个渠道产生了根本不同的议程序列。根据乌克兰的案例,他们提供了冲突媒体报道阶段的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Media War and Conflict
Media War and Conflict COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Media, War & Conflict is a major new international, peer-reviewed journal that maps the shifting arena of war, conflict and terrorism in an intensively and extensively mediated age. It will explore cultural, political and technological transformations in media-military relations, journalistic practices, and new media, and their impact on policy, publics, and outcomes of warfare. Media, War & Conflict is the first journal to be dedicated to this field. It will publish substantial research articles, shorter pieces, book reviews, letters and commentary, and will include an images section devoted to visual aspects of war and conflict.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信