The influences of communitarian philosophy in public policy: mapping the discourse of Scottish public library strategy

IF 1.7 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Colin Paton, David McMenemy
{"title":"The influences of communitarian philosophy in public policy: mapping the discourse of Scottish public library strategy","authors":"Colin Paton, David McMenemy","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2023-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research investigates the presence of communitarian philosophy within contemporary Scottish public library strategy, exploring links between philosophy, politics and practice.Design/methodology/approachThe paper follows a qualitative research approach, combining content analysis and discourse analysis methodologies for the analysis of a corpus of Scottish public library trust documentation according to a thematic framework of communitarian values.FindingsThe analysis revealed strong links between trust strategy and communitarian values but also highlighted contradictions within this form of communitarianism which belied a deeper neoliberal philosophical foundation. The research therefore identified a communitarian strategic service shift which introduced benefits of social inclusion, community autonomy and common good but also brought concerns of an inherently weakened communal foundation and the survival of a neoliberal status quo.Research limitations/implicationsThe analysis is focused on strategy in Scotland only and thus can only claim to be representative of that country. However, the growth in communitarian strategies in the public sector is informed from the analysis undertaken.Practical implicationsThe paper provides a novel analysis of public library strategy and thus contributes to the understanding of public library practice in the modern era.Social implicationsThe impacts of communitarian philosophy in the public sphere are under-researched and how these changes impact the mission of libraries needs to be better understood.Originality/valueThis is the first analysis to consider public library strategy from a communitarian point of view. As such, it provides novel insights into a growing area of public service development.","PeriodicalId":47969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Documentation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-02-2023-0020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis research investigates the presence of communitarian philosophy within contemporary Scottish public library strategy, exploring links between philosophy, politics and practice.Design/methodology/approachThe paper follows a qualitative research approach, combining content analysis and discourse analysis methodologies for the analysis of a corpus of Scottish public library trust documentation according to a thematic framework of communitarian values.FindingsThe analysis revealed strong links between trust strategy and communitarian values but also highlighted contradictions within this form of communitarianism which belied a deeper neoliberal philosophical foundation. The research therefore identified a communitarian strategic service shift which introduced benefits of social inclusion, community autonomy and common good but also brought concerns of an inherently weakened communal foundation and the survival of a neoliberal status quo.Research limitations/implicationsThe analysis is focused on strategy in Scotland only and thus can only claim to be representative of that country. However, the growth in communitarian strategies in the public sector is informed from the analysis undertaken.Practical implicationsThe paper provides a novel analysis of public library strategy and thus contributes to the understanding of public library practice in the modern era.Social implicationsThe impacts of communitarian philosophy in the public sphere are under-researched and how these changes impact the mission of libraries needs to be better understood.Originality/valueThis is the first analysis to consider public library strategy from a communitarian point of view. As such, it provides novel insights into a growing area of public service development.
社群主义哲学在公共政策中的影响——苏格兰公共图书馆战略话语映射
目的本研究旨在探讨社群主义哲学在当代苏格兰公共图书馆战略中的存在,探讨哲学、政治和实践之间的联系。设计/方法论/方法本文采用定性研究方法,结合内容分析和话语分析方法,根据社群主义价值观的主题框架,对苏格兰公共图书馆信托文献语料库进行分析。发现该分析揭示了信任策略和社群主义价值观之间的紧密联系,但也突显了这种形式的社群主义内部的矛盾,这种矛盾掩盖了更深层次的新自由主义哲学基础。因此,该研究确定了一种社群主义的战略服务转变,它带来了社会包容、社区自治和共同利益的好处,但也带来了对固有的削弱的社区基础和新自由主义现状的生存的担忧。研究局限性/含义分析仅关注苏格兰的战略,因此只能声称自己是该国的代表。然而,公共部门社群主义战略的增长是根据所进行的分析得出的。实践意义本文对公共图书馆战略进行了新颖的分析,从而有助于理解现代公共图书馆的实践。社会含义社群主义哲学在公共领域的影响研究不足,这些变化如何影响图书馆的使命需要更好地理解。原创性/价值这是第一次从社群主义的角度来考虑公共图书馆战略的分析。因此,它为日益增长的公共服务发展领域提供了新颖的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Documentation
Journal of Documentation INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The scope of the Journal of Documentation is broadly information sciences, encompassing all of the academic and professional disciplines which deal with recorded information. These include, but are certainly not limited to: ■Information science, librarianship and related disciplines ■Information and knowledge management ■Information and knowledge organisation ■Information seeking and retrieval, and human information behaviour ■Information and digital literacies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信