Soil health practices have different outcomes depending on local soil conditions

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Scott M. Devine, K. Steenwerth, A. O’Geen
{"title":"Soil health practices have different outcomes depending on local soil conditions","authors":"Scott M. Devine, K. Steenwerth, A. O’Geen","doi":"10.3733/ca.2022a0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The amount of soil organic matter is a critical indicator of soil health. Applying compost or manure, growing cover crops, reducing tillage, and increasing crop diversity may increase soil organic matter. However, soil organic matter can vary dramatically in different environments, regardless of management practices. This calls for a framework to recommend place-based soil health practices and evaluate their outcomes. We used a new framework that groups soil survey data into seven regions in California's Central Valley and Central Coast. These regions either have performance limitations, such as root restrictive horizons, salinity, and shrink-swell behavior, or have relatively homogeneous, coarse-to-loamy soils ideal for agriculture. These inherent conditions affect a soil's response to practices designed to improve soil health. Looking at vineyards as an example, we find significant soil organic matter contrasts between soil health regions but not among contrasting management approaches within a given region. We also show that conservation practices improve or help maintain soil health in several long-term experiments, but inherent soil properties and types of cropping systems affect outcomes.","PeriodicalId":9409,"journal":{"name":"California Agriculture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"California Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.2022a0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The amount of soil organic matter is a critical indicator of soil health. Applying compost or manure, growing cover crops, reducing tillage, and increasing crop diversity may increase soil organic matter. However, soil organic matter can vary dramatically in different environments, regardless of management practices. This calls for a framework to recommend place-based soil health practices and evaluate their outcomes. We used a new framework that groups soil survey data into seven regions in California's Central Valley and Central Coast. These regions either have performance limitations, such as root restrictive horizons, salinity, and shrink-swell behavior, or have relatively homogeneous, coarse-to-loamy soils ideal for agriculture. These inherent conditions affect a soil's response to practices designed to improve soil health. Looking at vineyards as an example, we find significant soil organic matter contrasts between soil health regions but not among contrasting management approaches within a given region. We also show that conservation practices improve or help maintain soil health in several long-term experiments, but inherent soil properties and types of cropping systems affect outcomes.
根据当地土壤条件的不同,土壤健康实践会产生不同的结果
土壤有机质含量是土壤健康的重要指标。施用堆肥或粪肥、种植覆盖作物、减少耕作和增加作物多样性可能会增加土壤有机质。然而,无论管理实践如何,土壤有机质在不同的环境中都会有巨大的差异。这就需要一个框架来推荐基于地点的土壤健康实践并评估其结果。我们使用了一个新的框架,将土壤调查数据分组到加利福尼亚州中央山谷和中央海岸的七个地区。这些地区要么有性能限制,如根系限制层、盐度和收缩膨胀行为,要么有相对均匀的、粗糙到壤土,非常适合农业。这些固有条件会影响土壤对旨在改善土壤健康的做法的反应。以葡萄园为例,我们发现土壤健康区域之间存在显著的土壤有机质对比,但在特定区域内不同的管理方法之间却没有。我们还在几项长期实验中表明,保护措施可以改善或有助于保持土壤健康,但固有的土壤特性和种植系统类型会影响结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
California Agriculture
California Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信