Evaluating anti-poverty policy efficiencies in China: meta-frontier analysis using the two-stage data envelopment analysis model

IF 4.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Guotao Yang, Yue Wang, Hui-Ju Chang, Qing-jun Chen
{"title":"Evaluating anti-poverty policy efficiencies in China: meta-frontier analysis using the two-stage data envelopment analysis model","authors":"Guotao Yang, Yue Wang, Hui-Ju Chang, Qing-jun Chen","doi":"10.1108/caer-10-2020-0254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study examines the relative efficiencies of anti-poverty policies implemented in 28 Chinese provinces.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses meta-frontier undesirable dynamic two-stage data envelopment analysis. The authors divide the poverty reduction process into two stages: agricultural production and poverty reduction. Public expenditure is the input for the second stage, and the population below the poverty line is the undesirable output. The authors compute the efficiencies (overall efficiency, efficiency of each stage and the efficiencies of individual inputs and outputs) using meta-frontier analysis for the 28 provinces.FindingsThe results show that: (1) a significant imbalance exists between the eastern and western regions in terms of input-output efficiencies; (2) the poverty reduction stage generally fared better than the agricultural production stage did. In particular, most provinces saw increases in poverty reduction efficiencies between 2013 and 2017; (3) the place-based poverty relief policies introduced in recent years are effective at reducing the poverty rate and reaching the government-set goals and (4) while disposable income has increased steadily over the past few years, income inequality has been exacerbated.Research limitations/implicationsThe results show that: (1) a significant imbalance exists between the eastern and western regions in terms of input-output efficiencies; (2) the poverty reduction stage generally fared better than the agricultural production stage did. In particular, most provinces saw increases in poverty reduction efficiencies between 2013 and 2017; (3) the place-based poverty relief policies introduced in recent years are effective at reducing the poverty rate and reaching the government-set goals and (4) while disposable income has increased steadily over the past few years, income inequality has exacerbated.Originality/valueA large amount of attention and public resources are devoted to fighting poverty and associated market failures in China. The extant literature focuses either on the agricultural production itself or the relationship between human capital and productivity levels. Making use of recent developments of the DEA method, the authors propose a new framework for evaluating the efficiencies of the poverty reduction process. Such a framework has the advantage of giving researchers and policymakers a more detailed diagnosis with regard to the components in the endeavor to eliminate poverty and providing useful information for policymakers to optimize public funds use. Methodologically, the framework is flexible enough to be employed for future research in similar appraisals, at different geographic and scale aggregation levels, for public projects including but not limited to poverty reduction.","PeriodicalId":10095,"journal":{"name":"China Agricultural Economic Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Agricultural Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-10-2020-0254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

PurposeThis study examines the relative efficiencies of anti-poverty policies implemented in 28 Chinese provinces.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses meta-frontier undesirable dynamic two-stage data envelopment analysis. The authors divide the poverty reduction process into two stages: agricultural production and poverty reduction. Public expenditure is the input for the second stage, and the population below the poverty line is the undesirable output. The authors compute the efficiencies (overall efficiency, efficiency of each stage and the efficiencies of individual inputs and outputs) using meta-frontier analysis for the 28 provinces.FindingsThe results show that: (1) a significant imbalance exists between the eastern and western regions in terms of input-output efficiencies; (2) the poverty reduction stage generally fared better than the agricultural production stage did. In particular, most provinces saw increases in poverty reduction efficiencies between 2013 and 2017; (3) the place-based poverty relief policies introduced in recent years are effective at reducing the poverty rate and reaching the government-set goals and (4) while disposable income has increased steadily over the past few years, income inequality has been exacerbated.Research limitations/implicationsThe results show that: (1) a significant imbalance exists between the eastern and western regions in terms of input-output efficiencies; (2) the poverty reduction stage generally fared better than the agricultural production stage did. In particular, most provinces saw increases in poverty reduction efficiencies between 2013 and 2017; (3) the place-based poverty relief policies introduced in recent years are effective at reducing the poverty rate and reaching the government-set goals and (4) while disposable income has increased steadily over the past few years, income inequality has exacerbated.Originality/valueA large amount of attention and public resources are devoted to fighting poverty and associated market failures in China. The extant literature focuses either on the agricultural production itself or the relationship between human capital and productivity levels. Making use of recent developments of the DEA method, the authors propose a new framework for evaluating the efficiencies of the poverty reduction process. Such a framework has the advantage of giving researchers and policymakers a more detailed diagnosis with regard to the components in the endeavor to eliminate poverty and providing useful information for policymakers to optimize public funds use. Methodologically, the framework is flexible enough to be employed for future research in similar appraisals, at different geographic and scale aggregation levels, for public projects including but not limited to poverty reduction.
中国反贫困政策效率评价:基于两阶段数据包络分析模型的元前沿分析
目的研究中国28个省份反贫困政策的相对效率。设计/方法/方法本研究采用元前沿非期望动态两阶段数据包络分析。作者将减贫过程分为农业生产和减贫两个阶段。公共支出是第二阶段的投入,贫困线以下的人口是不受欢迎的产出。作者利用元前沿分析计算了28个省的效率(总效率、各阶段效率和个别投入产出效率)。结果表明:(1)东西部地区投入产出效率存在显著不平衡;(2)减贫阶段总体优于农业生产阶段。特别是,2013年至2017年期间,大多数省份的减贫效率都有所提高;(3)近年来实施的地域性扶贫政策有效降低了贫困率,实现了政府设定的目标;(4)近年来居民可支配收入稳步增长,但收入不平等加剧。研究结果表明:(1)东西部地区投入产出效率存在显著不平衡;(2)减贫阶段总体优于农业生产阶段。特别是,2013年至2017年期间,大多数省份的减贫效率都有所提高;(3)近年来实施的地域性扶贫政策有效降低了贫困率,达到了政府设定的目标;(4)近年来居民可支配收入稳步增长,但收入不平等加剧。在中国,大量的注意力和公共资源投入到消除贫困和相关的市场失灵上。现有文献要么关注农业生产本身,要么关注人力资本与生产力水平的关系。利用DEA方法的最新发展,作者提出了一个评估减贫进程效率的新框架。这样一个框架的优点是使研究人员和政策制定者对努力消除贫困的组成部分作出更详细的诊断,并为政策制定者优化公共资金的使用提供有用的信息。在方法上,该框架具有足够的灵活性,可用于未来在不同地理和规模汇总水平上对公共项目(包括但不限于减贫项目)进行类似评估的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
China Agricultural Economic Review
China Agricultural Economic Review AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published in association with China Agricultural University and the Chinese Association for Agricultural Economics, China Agricultural Economic Review publishes academic writings by international scholars, and particularly encourages empirical work that can be replicated and extended by others; and research articles that employ econometric and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models. The journal aims to publish research which can be applied to China’s agricultural and rural policy-making process, the development of the agricultural economics discipline and to developing countries hoping to learn from China’s agricultural and rural development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信