The Mediating Effect of Power and Trust in the Relationship Between Procedural Justice and Tax Compliance

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Sellywati Mohd Faizal, Mohd Rizal Palil, Ruhanita Maelah, Rosiati Ramli
{"title":"The Mediating Effect of Power and Trust in the Relationship Between Procedural Justice and Tax Compliance","authors":"Sellywati Mohd Faizal, Mohd Rizal Palil, Ruhanita Maelah, Rosiati Ramli","doi":"10.17576/ajag-2019-11-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various factors that have been identified by researchers in Malaysia which may influence tax compliance behavior for example tax complexity; compliance costs; penalties; and tax knowledge. Yet, it is still unable to provide a solution to minimize tax non-compliance. Thus, this research identifies other factors, if any and their effect on Malaysian tax compliance behavior. The factors are procedural justice, trust and power. As far as known, no study in Malaysia examines the effect of these factors on tax compliance in a single study. Studies conducted outside Malaysia have found that procedural justice has a significant and positive relationship with tax compliance. In addition, there are also studies which described that procedural justice has the relationship with trust and legitimate power. Therefore, the objective of this study is to examine the relationship between procedural justice and compliance with the existing of trust and power as mediator. Structural Equation Model (SEM) is used to analyze the data that has been collected from 241 respondents. The findings suggest that procedural justice and trust have a positive relationship with tax compliance. Moreover, the bootstrapping approach found that trust could be a mediator in the relationship between procedural justice and tax compliance. In contrast, neither legitimate power nor coercive power could influence tax compliance and mediate the relationship between procedural justice and tax compliance","PeriodicalId":42796,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/ajag-2019-11-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Various factors that have been identified by researchers in Malaysia which may influence tax compliance behavior for example tax complexity; compliance costs; penalties; and tax knowledge. Yet, it is still unable to provide a solution to minimize tax non-compliance. Thus, this research identifies other factors, if any and their effect on Malaysian tax compliance behavior. The factors are procedural justice, trust and power. As far as known, no study in Malaysia examines the effect of these factors on tax compliance in a single study. Studies conducted outside Malaysia have found that procedural justice has a significant and positive relationship with tax compliance. In addition, there are also studies which described that procedural justice has the relationship with trust and legitimate power. Therefore, the objective of this study is to examine the relationship between procedural justice and compliance with the existing of trust and power as mediator. Structural Equation Model (SEM) is used to analyze the data that has been collected from 241 respondents. The findings suggest that procedural justice and trust have a positive relationship with tax compliance. Moreover, the bootstrapping approach found that trust could be a mediator in the relationship between procedural justice and tax compliance. In contrast, neither legitimate power nor coercive power could influence tax compliance and mediate the relationship between procedural justice and tax compliance
权力与信任在程序正义与税收遵从关系中的中介作用
马来西亚研究人员发现的可能影响纳税行为的各种因素,例如税收复杂性;合规成本;处罚;以及税务知识。然而,它仍然无法提供一个解决方案来最大限度地减少税收违规。因此,本研究确定了其他因素(如果有的话)及其对马来西亚税务合规行为的影响。这些因素包括程序正义、信任和权力。据了解,马来西亚没有一项研究在一项研究中考察这些因素对纳税遵从性的影响。在马来西亚境外进行的研究发现,程序正义与税收合规性有着重要而积极的关系。此外,也有研究表明,程序正义与信任和合法权力之间存在关系。因此,本研究的目的是考察程序正义与作为调解人的信任和权力的存在之间的关系。结构方程模型(SEM)用于分析从241名受访者中收集的数据。研究结果表明,程序正义和信任与税收合规性呈正相关。此外,自举方法发现,信任可以成为程序正义和税收合规之间关系的中介。相比之下,合法权力和强制权力都不能影响税收合规,也不能调解程序正义与税收合规之间的关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信