Sketch for a Sociology of Sociological Self-Analyses

Q4 Social Sciences

Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.3280/sr2021-126002

Gerardo Ienna, C. Lombardo, L. Sabetta, M. Santoro

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay analyzes one of the major expressions of the sociological critique of sociological reasoning, the objectivation of the subject of objectivation, who should analyze the sociohistorical conditions of possibility of the very act of objectivation. Though Bourdieu's invitation to a reflexive sociology of sociology has not been widely accepted and put into practice, the authors argue that its actual application actually brings about consistent payoff: this special issue represents but one installment. Reclaiming a place for socio-analysis, this paper highlights how this activity can produce a cognitive difference in the making of sociological research, insofar as its genesis and development are defined by the sharing of a specific thought style, existing within and because of an intersubjective framework.

查看原文本刊更多论文

社会学自我分析的社会学草图

本文分析了社会学对社会学推理的批判的主要表现之一，即客观化主体的客观化，并分析了客观化行为发生的社会历史条件。虽然布迪厄对社会学的反思性社会学的邀请尚未被广泛接受和付诸实践，但作者认为，它的实际应用实际上带来了一致的回报:本期特刊只是其中的一部分。本文为社会分析重新找到了一席之地，强调了这一活动如何在社会学研究的过程中产生认知差异，因为它的起源和发展是由一种特定的思维方式的共享所定义的，这种思维方式存在于一个主体间框架中，并且由于这种框架而存在。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale (Sociology and Sociological Research), was founded in 1980 by a group of professors from different Italian universities and different branches of Sociology. The aim was to achieve two main goals. The first was to create a channel for communication among specialists not subject to academic limitation of any sort. The second was to pursue the project of a logically and methodologically based empirical research, focusing on one hand on the relations between scientific statute of social theory, and on the other on social intervention. The fundamental need for pluralism has guided the work of this review since it was founded. Italian and foreign authors from academic, research or professional backgrounds discuss themes and issues that range from social theory, sociology of communication, professions in the field, complex organizations, and social services, to labor rights and policies and sociology of the sciences and knowledge.