Endometrium kanserli obez hastalarda laparoskopik ve açık cerrahinin karşılaştırılması

Ceren Sancar, Nuriye Yıldırım, Ahmet Bi̇lgi̇, Sevki Gokulu, L. Akman, Mustafa COŞAN TEREK, Ahmet AYDIN ÖZSARAN
{"title":"Endometrium kanserli obez hastalarda laparoskopik ve açık cerrahinin karşılaştırılması","authors":"Ceren Sancar, Nuriye Yıldırım, Ahmet Bi̇lgi̇, Sevki Gokulu, L. Akman, Mustafa COŞAN TEREK, Ahmet AYDIN ÖZSARAN","doi":"10.19161/etd.1125610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the results of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy in obese women with endometrial cancer (EC). Materials and Methods: Patients with endometrial cancer whose BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and who were undergone total laparoscopic hysterectomy (n=68) or total abdominal hysterectomy (n=161) were included in the study. Demographic and histopathological features, disease-free survival and overall survival of the patients were recorded. All these data of laparoscopy and laparotomy patients were compared with each other. \nResults: No significant difference was observed between two groups in terms of stage, tumor grade, histology, lymph node dissection rate and number of removed lymph nodes. Cardiovascular diseases were more common in laparotomy group (p=0.002). ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score was higher in laparotomy group (p=0.001). Perioperative and postoperative complications were similar in both groups. The operation time was significantly longer and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group (p","PeriodicalId":32499,"journal":{"name":"Ege Tip Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ege Tip Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1125610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the results of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy in obese women with endometrial cancer (EC). Materials and Methods: Patients with endometrial cancer whose BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and who were undergone total laparoscopic hysterectomy (n=68) or total abdominal hysterectomy (n=161) were included in the study. Demographic and histopathological features, disease-free survival and overall survival of the patients were recorded. All these data of laparoscopy and laparotomy patients were compared with each other. Results: No significant difference was observed between two groups in terms of stage, tumor grade, histology, lymph node dissection rate and number of removed lymph nodes. Cardiovascular diseases were more common in laparotomy group (p=0.002). ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score was higher in laparotomy group (p=0.001). Perioperative and postoperative complications were similar in both groups. The operation time was significantly longer and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group (p
在肥胖癌症中,子宫内膜比较腹腔镜和开放手术
目的:比较肥胖癌症(EC)患者腹腔镜全子宫切除术和腹式全子宫切除手术的结果。材料与方法:纳入子宫内膜癌症患者,BMI≥30kg/m2,行腹腔镜全子宫切除术(n=68)或腹式全子宫切除手术(n=161)。记录患者的人口学和组织病理学特征、无病生存率和总生存率。将腹腔镜和剖腹手术患者的所有这些数据相互比较。结果:两组在分期、肿瘤分级、组织学、淋巴结清扫率和淋巴结转移数等方面无显著差异。心血管疾病在剖腹手术组中更常见(p=0.002)。ASA(美国麻醉师协会)评分在剖腹术组中更高(p=0.001)。两组的围手术期和术后并发症相似。腹腔镜组手术时间明显延长,术后住院时间明显缩短(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信