Analisis Yuridis Ratio Decidendi Majelis Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Vonis Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tenggarong Nomor 390/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Trg

Abstract

 scientific development, and on the other hand, can also cause dependence which is very detrimental if misused or used without supervision. Strict and careful. This research includes normative research in law, for normative legal research only recognizes secondary data, including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data processing and data analysis depend on the type of data. Research on positive legal inventories, legal principles, clinical legal research, legal systematics, judicial decisions, legal history, and legal comparisons are all included in secondary data. In the Tenggarong District Court Decision Number 390/Pid.Sus/2021/PN. The Public Prosecutor charged the perpetrator, Mattaro bin Juma, with subsidiary charges, where the direct indictment is "Article 114 paragraph (1) jo. Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009. The subsidiary charges are Article 112 paragraph (1) jo. Article 132 paragraph (1) of the Narcotics Law, as well as more subsidiary charges, namely Article 127 paragraph (1)". People who abuse drugs derive pleasure from them. The drugs themselves need to be owned, kept in their hands, under their control, and available to them. People who abuse drugs are unlikely to use drugs in situations where they have no control over the drugs they use. According to the findings of this investigation, those who abuse drugs must comply with Article 112 of the Narcotics Law. Keywords: Narcotics, Ratio Decidendi, Sentencing.