Case C-243/15 Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Obvodný úrad Trenčín

IF 1.2 Q1 LAW
Matthijs van Wolferen
{"title":"Case C-243/15 Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Obvodný úrad Trenčín","authors":"Matthijs van Wolferen","doi":"10.1163/18760104-01401008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussion on the relevance of Case C-243/15 Lesoochranarske zoskupenie VLK v Obvodný urad Trencin, the 'second Slovak bear' case. Where the Habitats Directive is again linked to access to justice as prescribed by the Aarhus Convention, this time in conjunction with Article 47 Charter on a right to a remedy. This is a proof-version, for citation and research purposes, please refer to the final version at the JEEPL site.","PeriodicalId":43633,"journal":{"name":"Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law","volume":"14 1","pages":"136-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18760104-01401008","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01401008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Discussion on the relevance of Case C-243/15 Lesoochranarske zoskupenie VLK v Obvodný urad Trencin, the 'second Slovak bear' case. Where the Habitats Directive is again linked to access to justice as prescribed by the Aarhus Convention, this time in conjunction with Article 47 Charter on a right to a remedy. This is a proof-version, for citation and research purposes, please refer to the final version at the JEEPL site.
案件C-243/15 Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK诉Obvod nýúrad Trenčín
关于“第二只斯洛伐克熊”案件C-243/15 Lesoochranarske zoskupenie VLK诉Obvodnýurad Trencin的相关性的讨论。如果《居住指令》再次与《奥胡斯公约》规定的诉诸司法联系在一起,这一次是与《宪章》关于补救权的第47条相结合。这是一个证明版本,出于引用和研究目的,请参阅JEEPL网站上的最终版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信