Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men With High-Grade Intraepithelial Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation

Robert D. Norman, H. Garg, Lanette Rickborn, D. Kaushik, D. Pruthi, Ahmed M. Mansour, Ian M. Thompson, M. Liss
{"title":"Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men With High-Grade Intraepithelial Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation","authors":"Robert D. Norman, H. Garg, Lanette Rickborn, D. Kaushik, D. Pruthi, Ahmed M. Mansour, Ian M. Thompson, M. Liss","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The clinical management of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation (ASAP) and High-Grade Prostate Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HGPIN) varies significantly. The aim of this study was to characterize the incidence and natural history of ASAP and HGPIN lesions to optimize follow-up strategies.\n \n \n \n A retrospective analysis of patients at a VA Medical Center who underwent a prostate needle biopsy between 1988 and 2017 was performed. The pathological lesions were grouped as ASAP, HGPIN, and ASAP & HGPIN. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as grade group ≥2 prostate cancer.\n \n \n \n Of 6104 patients screened, 312 patients included having ASAP (n = 70, 1.1%), HGPIN (n = 222, 3.6%), or ASAP & HGPIN (n = 20, 0.3%). Follow-up biopsy was performed in 99.3% of patients. The incidence of prostate cancer in ASAP, HGPIN, or ASAP & HGPIN groups was 46.3%, 37%, and 68.4%, respectively (P = .03). However, the rate of csPCa was similar across the 3 groups (10.1% in ASAP, 10.3% in HGPIN, and 10.5% in ASAP & HGPIN, P = .6). The median time to cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter for patients with ASAP (2.8 years for ASAP, 4.9 years for HGPIN, and 1.5 years for ASAP & HGPIN, P = .001); however, there was no significant difference in time to diagnosis of csPCa between the various groups (P = .7).\n \n \n \n Both ASAP and HGPIN have a low risk of progression to csPCa. This, coupled with a prolonged time to any cancer diagnosis, suggests that immediate repeat biopsy might not be necessary among these patients.\n","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The clinical management of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation (ASAP) and High-Grade Prostate Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HGPIN) varies significantly. The aim of this study was to characterize the incidence and natural history of ASAP and HGPIN lesions to optimize follow-up strategies. A retrospective analysis of patients at a VA Medical Center who underwent a prostate needle biopsy between 1988 and 2017 was performed. The pathological lesions were grouped as ASAP, HGPIN, and ASAP & HGPIN. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as grade group ≥2 prostate cancer. Of 6104 patients screened, 312 patients included having ASAP (n = 70, 1.1%), HGPIN (n = 222, 3.6%), or ASAP & HGPIN (n = 20, 0.3%). Follow-up biopsy was performed in 99.3% of patients. The incidence of prostate cancer in ASAP, HGPIN, or ASAP & HGPIN groups was 46.3%, 37%, and 68.4%, respectively (P = .03). However, the rate of csPCa was similar across the 3 groups (10.1% in ASAP, 10.3% in HGPIN, and 10.5% in ASAP & HGPIN, P = .6). The median time to cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter for patients with ASAP (2.8 years for ASAP, 4.9 years for HGPIN, and 1.5 years for ASAP & HGPIN, P = .001); however, there was no significant difference in time to diagnosis of csPCa between the various groups (P = .7). Both ASAP and HGPIN have a low risk of progression to csPCa. This, coupled with a prolonged time to any cancer diagnosis, suggests that immediate repeat biopsy might not be necessary among these patients.
男性高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变或非典型小腺泡增生的临床意义前列腺癌
非典型小腺泡增生(ASAP)和高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变(HGPIN)的临床处理有显著差异。本研究的目的是描述ASAP和HGPIN病变的发生率和自然病史,以优化随访策略。对1988年至2017年在VA医疗中心接受前列腺穿刺活检的患者进行了回顾性分析。病理病变分为ASAP、HGPIN、ASAP + HGPIN。主要终点是临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的发生率,定义为≥2级组前列腺癌。在6104例筛查患者中,312例患者包括ASAP (n = 70, 1.1%)、HGPIN (n = 222, 3.6%)或ASAP + HGPIN (n = 20, 0.3%)。99.3%的患者进行了随访活检。ASAP组、HGPIN组、ASAP + HGPIN组前列腺癌发病率分别为46.3%、37%、68.4% (P = 0.03)。然而,三组间csPCa发生率相似(ASAP为10.1%,HGPIN为10.3%,ASAP + HGPIN为10.5%,P = 0.6)。ASAP患者到癌症诊断的中位时间显著缩短(ASAP为2.8年,HGPIN为4.9年,ASAP和HGPIN为1.5年,P = .001);两组间csPCa的诊断时间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.7)。ASAP和HGPIN进展为csPCa的风险都很低。这一点,再加上任何癌症诊断的较长时间,表明这些患者可能没有必要立即重复活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信