Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men With High-Grade Intraepithelial Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation
Robert D. Norman, H. Garg, Lanette Rickborn, D. Kaushik, D. Pruthi, Ahmed M. Mansour, Ian M. Thompson, M. Liss
{"title":"Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men With High-Grade Intraepithelial Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation","authors":"Robert D. Norman, H. Garg, Lanette Rickborn, D. Kaushik, D. Pruthi, Ahmed M. Mansour, Ian M. Thompson, M. Liss","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The clinical management of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation (ASAP) and High-Grade Prostate Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HGPIN) varies significantly. The aim of this study was to characterize the incidence and natural history of ASAP and HGPIN lesions to optimize follow-up strategies.\n \n \n \n A retrospective analysis of patients at a VA Medical Center who underwent a prostate needle biopsy between 1988 and 2017 was performed. The pathological lesions were grouped as ASAP, HGPIN, and ASAP & HGPIN. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as grade group ≥2 prostate cancer.\n \n \n \n Of 6104 patients screened, 312 patients included having ASAP (n = 70, 1.1%), HGPIN (n = 222, 3.6%), or ASAP & HGPIN (n = 20, 0.3%). Follow-up biopsy was performed in 99.3% of patients. The incidence of prostate cancer in ASAP, HGPIN, or ASAP & HGPIN groups was 46.3%, 37%, and 68.4%, respectively (P = .03). However, the rate of csPCa was similar across the 3 groups (10.1% in ASAP, 10.3% in HGPIN, and 10.5% in ASAP & HGPIN, P = .6). The median time to cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter for patients with ASAP (2.8 years for ASAP, 4.9 years for HGPIN, and 1.5 years for ASAP & HGPIN, P = .001); however, there was no significant difference in time to diagnosis of csPCa between the various groups (P = .7).\n \n \n \n Both ASAP and HGPIN have a low risk of progression to csPCa. This, coupled with a prolonged time to any cancer diagnosis, suggests that immediate repeat biopsy might not be necessary among these patients.\n","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The clinical management of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation (ASAP) and High-Grade Prostate Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HGPIN) varies significantly. The aim of this study was to characterize the incidence and natural history of ASAP and HGPIN lesions to optimize follow-up strategies.
A retrospective analysis of patients at a VA Medical Center who underwent a prostate needle biopsy between 1988 and 2017 was performed. The pathological lesions were grouped as ASAP, HGPIN, and ASAP & HGPIN. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as grade group ≥2 prostate cancer.
Of 6104 patients screened, 312 patients included having ASAP (n = 70, 1.1%), HGPIN (n = 222, 3.6%), or ASAP & HGPIN (n = 20, 0.3%). Follow-up biopsy was performed in 99.3% of patients. The incidence of prostate cancer in ASAP, HGPIN, or ASAP & HGPIN groups was 46.3%, 37%, and 68.4%, respectively (P = .03). However, the rate of csPCa was similar across the 3 groups (10.1% in ASAP, 10.3% in HGPIN, and 10.5% in ASAP & HGPIN, P = .6). The median time to cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter for patients with ASAP (2.8 years for ASAP, 4.9 years for HGPIN, and 1.5 years for ASAP & HGPIN, P = .001); however, there was no significant difference in time to diagnosis of csPCa between the various groups (P = .7).
Both ASAP and HGPIN have a low risk of progression to csPCa. This, coupled with a prolonged time to any cancer diagnosis, suggests that immediate repeat biopsy might not be necessary among these patients.