Euromissiles: The Nuclear Weapons That Nearly Destroyed NATO

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 Q2 HISTORY
David W. Kearn
{"title":"Euromissiles: The Nuclear Weapons That Nearly Destroyed NATO","authors":"David W. Kearn","doi":"10.1080/09592296.2023.2186617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"interconnections. Its priority is ensuring the harmony of the whole. Its emphases include preserving diversity, mutual adaptation, and cooperation. It is informed by ancient cosmologies and indigenous pre-colonial diplomatic practices including the symbolic exchanges and visits that are prominent in Asian and African cultures. Diplomats need to work with all three logics, an argument which Zaharna makes visually, by elegantly combining symbols that she adopts for each logic (an arrow for individual, an infinity sign for relational and a circle for holistic) into a single figure. Having explained how differences of culture make communication more difficult, Zaharna goes on to demonstrate the potential for culturally-informed communication to bring people together. It is here that her argument returns to the more familiar territory of culture in diplomacy. She argues that collaboration and communication in the cultural field is the best way to use all three of her logics. Her book is hands down the best justification for international relations through the arts since the publication of Nye’s Soft Power in 2004, and – most significantly – her argument is made without falling back on the idea of one people exercising influence or winning over another that is implicit Nye’s book. Zaharna emphasises the win-win of mutual benefit. International actors able to work in these terms stand to develop their reputations even as they benefit from the collective solutions to the world’s problems. Hence Zaharna has arrived at a mechanism to enhance what I term ‘Reputational Security’, that element of security that comes from being known in the world and which is endangered by being unknown. One shared problem looms especially large. Zaharna’s work draws powerfully on the experience of the COVID-19 pandemic. Memes from the crisis are reproduced in the text. The argument is brave. Having drawn on insights from anthropology throughout, her book steers away from that discipline’s emphasis on cultural distinctiveness to emphasise the astonishing degree of similarity between people. Her final chapters focus on the potential for mutual understanding and empathy based on the things that all humans share. In all, this is an original and valuable work which rethinks the links between communication, culture and diplomacy. The great joy of this book is its eclecticism and the comprehensiveness of Zaharna’s ‘world tour’ with the multiple insights she brings. The result is a consistently illuminating and fun to read in equal measure. This is a book to celebrate and, for those of us in the position so to do, to assign as required reading for anyone setting out of the journey of an international communicator or in Zaharna’s terms ‘Boundary Spanner of Humanity’.","PeriodicalId":44804,"journal":{"name":"Diplomacy & Statecraft","volume":"34 1","pages":"146 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diplomacy & Statecraft","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2023.2186617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

interconnections. Its priority is ensuring the harmony of the whole. Its emphases include preserving diversity, mutual adaptation, and cooperation. It is informed by ancient cosmologies and indigenous pre-colonial diplomatic practices including the symbolic exchanges and visits that are prominent in Asian and African cultures. Diplomats need to work with all three logics, an argument which Zaharna makes visually, by elegantly combining symbols that she adopts for each logic (an arrow for individual, an infinity sign for relational and a circle for holistic) into a single figure. Having explained how differences of culture make communication more difficult, Zaharna goes on to demonstrate the potential for culturally-informed communication to bring people together. It is here that her argument returns to the more familiar territory of culture in diplomacy. She argues that collaboration and communication in the cultural field is the best way to use all three of her logics. Her book is hands down the best justification for international relations through the arts since the publication of Nye’s Soft Power in 2004, and – most significantly – her argument is made without falling back on the idea of one people exercising influence or winning over another that is implicit Nye’s book. Zaharna emphasises the win-win of mutual benefit. International actors able to work in these terms stand to develop their reputations even as they benefit from the collective solutions to the world’s problems. Hence Zaharna has arrived at a mechanism to enhance what I term ‘Reputational Security’, that element of security that comes from being known in the world and which is endangered by being unknown. One shared problem looms especially large. Zaharna’s work draws powerfully on the experience of the COVID-19 pandemic. Memes from the crisis are reproduced in the text. The argument is brave. Having drawn on insights from anthropology throughout, her book steers away from that discipline’s emphasis on cultural distinctiveness to emphasise the astonishing degree of similarity between people. Her final chapters focus on the potential for mutual understanding and empathy based on the things that all humans share. In all, this is an original and valuable work which rethinks the links between communication, culture and diplomacy. The great joy of this book is its eclecticism and the comprehensiveness of Zaharna’s ‘world tour’ with the multiple insights she brings. The result is a consistently illuminating and fun to read in equal measure. This is a book to celebrate and, for those of us in the position so to do, to assign as required reading for anyone setting out of the journey of an international communicator or in Zaharna’s terms ‘Boundary Spanner of Humanity’.
欧洲导弹:差点摧毁北约的核武器
互联。它的首要任务是确保整体的和谐。其重点包括保持多样性、相互适应和合作。它受到古代宇宙学和土著前殖民外交实践的影响,包括在亚洲和非洲文化中突出的象征性交流和访问。外交官们需要处理这三种逻辑,扎哈娜通过将她所采用的每种逻辑的符号(一个箭头代表个人,一个无穷大符号代表关系,一个圆圈代表整体)优雅地组合成一个单一的数字,从而在视觉上证明了这一点。在解释了文化差异如何使沟通变得更加困难之后,扎哈纳继续展示了文化知情沟通将人们聚集在一起的潜力。正是在这里,她的论点回到了更熟悉的外交文化领域。她认为,文化领域的合作与交流是运用这三种逻辑的最佳方式。自2004年奈的《软实力》出版以来,她的书无疑是通过艺术来解释国际关系的最佳理由,最重要的是,她的论点没有依赖于奈书中隐含的一个人施加影响或赢得另一个人的观点。扎哈娜强调互利共赢。能够以这种方式开展工作的国际行为体,即使在从世界问题的集体解决方案中受益的同时,也会提高自己的声誉。因此,扎哈纳已经找到了一种机制来加强我所说的“声誉安全”,这种安全元素来自于在世界上的知名度,并因不为人知而受到威胁。一个共同的问题显得尤为突出。扎哈纳的作品有力地借鉴了2019冠状病毒病大流行的经验。危机中的模因在文本中被复制。这个论点很勇敢。她的书从整个过程中汲取了人类学的见解,避开了这门学科对文化独特性的强调,转而强调人与人之间惊人程度的相似性。她的最后几章关注的是基于所有人类共有的东西的相互理解和同理心的潜力。总之,这是一部重新思考传播、文化和外交之间联系的原创和有价值的作品。这本书最大的乐趣在于它的折衷主义和扎哈娜“世界之旅”的全面性,以及她带来的多种见解。结果是一个始终如一的启发性和有趣的阅读在同等程度上。这是一本值得庆祝的书,对于我们这些有这样做的人来说,这是一本必读的书,对于任何一个踏上国际传播者之旅的人,或者用扎哈纳的话说,“人类的边界扳手”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信