The Role Of The Prosecutors In The Effort Of Assets Recovery From Corruption Crimes

Ius Poenale Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI:10.25041/ip.v3i2.2752
Midian Hosiholan Rumahorbo, Risa Mahdewi, Desia Rakhma Banjarani
{"title":"The Role Of The Prosecutors In The Effort Of Assets Recovery From Corruption Crimes","authors":"Midian Hosiholan Rumahorbo, Risa Mahdewi, Desia Rakhma Banjarani","doi":"10.25041/ip.v3i2.2752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Practically, corruption is an extraordinary crime, because the impact of corruption harmed the financial condition of a country, corruption are also alleged violated the social and economic rights of the community or citizens in the country. As a criminal act which included as an extraordinary crime, so an extraordinary method also needs to be applied in eradicating corruption. For this reason, an huge steps are needed to provide a deterrent effect to perpetrators of corruption. Punishment to corruption perpetrators is expected to provide a deterrent effect. One of that steps is to return the state losses which caused by corruption perpetrators, as well as being one of the anticipatory steps so that later people will not dare to commit corruption. This research was made with the aim to answer how to recover assets from corruption and to find out how the role of the prosecutor's office in efforts to recover assets from corruption crimes. In this research, the author uses normative legal research method, namely research that conducts an inventory of the applicable laws and regulations. The results of research regarding efforts to recover assets can be carried out through criminal and civil legal remedies. Furthermore, the role of the Prosecutor's Office as a law enforcement officer in charge of law enforcement regarding the assets recovery through criminal acts recognizes two mechanisms or procedures for recovery assets, the first mechanism or procedure is the seizure of assets without punishment, and the second is the mechanism or procedure for voluntary asset return. The steps that can be carried out in assets recovery are divided into several steps including the asset tracking steps, blocking or freezing steps, foreclosure, confiscation and return.","PeriodicalId":34813,"journal":{"name":"Ius Poenale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Poenale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v3i2.2752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Practically, corruption is an extraordinary crime, because the impact of corruption harmed the financial condition of a country, corruption are also alleged violated the social and economic rights of the community or citizens in the country. As a criminal act which included as an extraordinary crime, so an extraordinary method also needs to be applied in eradicating corruption. For this reason, an huge steps are needed to provide a deterrent effect to perpetrators of corruption. Punishment to corruption perpetrators is expected to provide a deterrent effect. One of that steps is to return the state losses which caused by corruption perpetrators, as well as being one of the anticipatory steps so that later people will not dare to commit corruption. This research was made with the aim to answer how to recover assets from corruption and to find out how the role of the prosecutor's office in efforts to recover assets from corruption crimes. In this research, the author uses normative legal research method, namely research that conducts an inventory of the applicable laws and regulations. The results of research regarding efforts to recover assets can be carried out through criminal and civil legal remedies. Furthermore, the role of the Prosecutor's Office as a law enforcement officer in charge of law enforcement regarding the assets recovery through criminal acts recognizes two mechanisms or procedures for recovery assets, the first mechanism or procedure is the seizure of assets without punishment, and the second is the mechanism or procedure for voluntary asset return. The steps that can be carried out in assets recovery are divided into several steps including the asset tracking steps, blocking or freezing steps, foreclosure, confiscation and return.
检察官在腐败犯罪资产追回工作中的作用
实际上,腐败是一种非同寻常的犯罪,因为腐败的影响损害了一个国家的财政状况,腐败也被指控侵犯了该国社区或公民的社会和经济权利。作为一种包括非常犯罪在内的犯罪行为,铲除腐败也需要运用非常方法。出于这个原因,需要采取重大措施,对腐败肇事者起到威慑作用。对腐败行为人的惩罚有望起到威慑作用。其中一个步骤是归还腐败肇事者造成的国家损失,也是一个预期步骤,这样以后的人就不敢犯腐败了。这项研究的目的是回答如何从腐败中追回资产,并了解检察官办公室在努力从腐败犯罪中追回资产方面的作用。在本研究中,作者采用了规范性法律研究方法,即对适用的法律法规进行盘点的研究。关于追回资产努力的研究结果可以通过刑事和民事法律补救办法进行。此外,检察官办公室作为负责通过犯罪行为追回资产的执法人员的作用承认了追回资产的两种机制或程序,第一种机制或过程是不受惩罚地扣押资产,第二种是自愿归还资产的机制或程序。可以在资产追回中执行的步骤分为几个步骤,包括资产跟踪步骤、阻止或冻结步骤、止赎、没收和返还。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信