The Effectiveness of Pressure Safety Valves in Chemical Supply Systems to Prevent Fire, Explosion and Overpressure in the Korean Semiconductor Industry
Kyeong-Seok Oh, Euittum Jeong, Woo Sub Shim, Jong-Bae Baek
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Pressure Safety Valves in Chemical Supply Systems to Prevent Fire, Explosion and Overpressure in the Korean Semiconductor Industry","authors":"Kyeong-Seok Oh, Euittum Jeong, Woo Sub Shim, Jong-Bae Baek","doi":"10.3390/fire6090344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to review the safety and appropriateness of PSV (Pressure Safety Valve) installation in the supply tank, which is a pressure vessel included in supply systems dedicated to supplying the acid/alkaline substances used in the Korean semiconductor manufacturing process. Three aspects of design, risk assessment, and regulations were reviewed to determine if there is a source of pressure higher than the maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) of the supply tank that could cause fires, explosions, and overpressure. In the case of the design review, all 17 overpressure scenarios described in API Standard 521, i.e., pressure-relieving and depressuring systems, were reviewed, and there was no overpressure scenario above the maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP). Then, the risk assessment, i.e., the Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) technique, was used, and as a result of reviewing all possible risk situations, we can state that there were no overpressure scenarios that can exceed the design pressure of the supply tank; thus, we decided that the installation of a PSV on top of the supply tank is unnecessary. Finally, accident prevention measures against overpressure, such as the KS B 6750-3 system design and the Korean Industrial Standard, were reviewed from a legal point of view. It was confirmed that the hazardous chemical supply system for the semiconductor industry designed in this study has several protective functions to prevent fires, explosions, and overpressure. As a result of reviewing the above three aspects, it can be said that there is no need to install a pressure safety valve in a pressure vessel storing hazardous chemicals.","PeriodicalId":36395,"journal":{"name":"Fire-Switzerland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire-Switzerland","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6090344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This study was conducted to review the safety and appropriateness of PSV (Pressure Safety Valve) installation in the supply tank, which is a pressure vessel included in supply systems dedicated to supplying the acid/alkaline substances used in the Korean semiconductor manufacturing process. Three aspects of design, risk assessment, and regulations were reviewed to determine if there is a source of pressure higher than the maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) of the supply tank that could cause fires, explosions, and overpressure. In the case of the design review, all 17 overpressure scenarios described in API Standard 521, i.e., pressure-relieving and depressuring systems, were reviewed, and there was no overpressure scenario above the maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP). Then, the risk assessment, i.e., the Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) technique, was used, and as a result of reviewing all possible risk situations, we can state that there were no overpressure scenarios that can exceed the design pressure of the supply tank; thus, we decided that the installation of a PSV on top of the supply tank is unnecessary. Finally, accident prevention measures against overpressure, such as the KS B 6750-3 system design and the Korean Industrial Standard, were reviewed from a legal point of view. It was confirmed that the hazardous chemical supply system for the semiconductor industry designed in this study has several protective functions to prevent fires, explosions, and overpressure. As a result of reviewing the above three aspects, it can be said that there is no need to install a pressure safety valve in a pressure vessel storing hazardous chemicals.
本研究旨在审查供应罐中PSV(压力安全阀)安装的安全性和适当性,供应罐是一种压力容器,包含在专门供应韩国半导体制造过程中使用的酸性/碱性物质的供应系统中。审查了设计、风险评估和法规的三个方面,以确定是否存在高于供应罐最大允许工作压力(MAWP)的压力源,从而可能导致火灾、爆炸和超压。在设计审查的情况下,审查了API标准521中描述的所有17种超压情况,即减压和减压系统,没有超过最大允许工作压力(MAWP)的超压情况。然后,使用了风险评估,即危险与可操作性研究(HAZOP)技术,作为审查所有可能风险情况的结果,我们可以声明不存在可能超过供应罐设计压力的超压情况;因此,我们决定在供应罐顶部安装PSV是不必要的。最后,从法律角度对KS B 6750-3系统设计和韩国工业标准等超压事故预防措施进行了评述。经证实,本研究中设计的半导体行业危险化学品供应系统具有多种保护功能,可防止火灾、爆炸和超压。回顾以上三个方面,可以说没有必要在储存危险化学品的压力容器中安装压力安全阀。