Reply to Wojtek Przepiorka: Testing goal-framing and hedonic hypocrisy

IF 1.3 4区社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY

Rationality and Society Pub Date : 2019-08-07 DOI:10.1177/1043463119869080

S. Lindenberg, L. Steg, M. Milovanovic, A. Schipper

引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is always an honor when, after one publishes a study, somebody takes the time and effort to figure out how it could have been done better (Lindenberg et al., 2018; Przepiorka, 2019). It is a public service, and we are grateful for the effort. Although we are and remain quite proud of our studies and their results, there is, as in any study, always room for improvement and it is certainly important to test hypotheses also via other designs. However, we feel there are a number of misinterpretations, omissions, and confusions in Dr. Przepiorka’s comments, each of which we would like to discuss.

查看原文本刊更多论文

回复Wojtek Przepiorka：测试目标框架和享乐虚伪

当一个人发表一项研究后，有人花时间和精力找出如何做得更好时，这总是一种荣誉（Lindenberg et al.，2018；Przepiorka，2019）。这是一项公共服务，我们对此表示感谢。尽管我们现在和现在都为我们的研究及其结果感到骄傲，但与任何研究一样，总有改进的空间，通过其他设计来检验假设当然也很重要。然而，我们觉得普热皮奥尔卡博士的评论中有许多误解、遗漏和混淆，我们想讨论每一个。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Rationality and Society SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Rationality & Society focuses on the growing contributions of rational-action based theory, and the questions and controversies surrounding this growth. Why Choose Rationality and Society? The trend toward ever-greater specialization in many areas of intellectual life has lead to fragmentation that deprives scholars of the ability to communicate even in closely adjoining fields. The emergence of the rational action paradigm as the inter-lingua of the social sciences is a remarkable exception to this trend. It is the one paradigm that offers the promise of bringing greater theoretical unity across disciplines such as economics, sociology, political science, cognitive psychology, moral philosophy and law.