Comparing the Effect of Monofilament and Braided Suture on Pregnancy Loss Rates in Women Requiring Vaginal Cervical Cerclage

A. Marai
{"title":"Comparing the Effect of Monofilament and Braided Suture on Pregnancy Loss Rates in Women Requiring Vaginal Cervical Cerclage","authors":"A. Marai","doi":"10.21608/ijma.2023.212954.1693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article information Background: Preterm birth affects 11% of pregnancies and can result in serious complications. Cervical insufficiency is a frequent reason for preterm birth and also can be treated with vaginal cervical cerclage using different types of sutures. Observational studies suggest that monofilament sutures may decrease pregnancy loss compared to braided sutures, but randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm this finding. Aim of the work: The research aims to assess the efficacy of monofilament versus braided sutures in preventing miscarriage for women undergoing vaginal cervical cerclage. Patients and Methods: This trial was done in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, El-Hussein University Hospital, from January 2020 to November 2022. There were 201 participants in the study. Individuals were monitored in the obstetrics and gynecological clinics at El-Hussein University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University. Females with a singleton pregnancy and a cervical cerclage indicator were split evenly amongst receiving a monofilament or braided suture. Pregnancy loss was the fundamental result; secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes. Surgeons were permitted to employ any method they found most effective. Results: No significant variances were present in baseline characteristics, pregnancy and maternal outcomes, and neonatal outcomes between the two study groups. However, the Monofilament suture group had significantly more complications with cerclage removal. Conclusion: Both monofilament and braided sutures are effective and safe procedures with minimal side effects and complications. Although monofilament suture may cause more difficult removal and removal complications, it remains a viable option for treating cervical insufficiency.","PeriodicalId":53130,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Arts","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijma.2023.212954.1693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article information Background: Preterm birth affects 11% of pregnancies and can result in serious complications. Cervical insufficiency is a frequent reason for preterm birth and also can be treated with vaginal cervical cerclage using different types of sutures. Observational studies suggest that monofilament sutures may decrease pregnancy loss compared to braided sutures, but randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm this finding. Aim of the work: The research aims to assess the efficacy of monofilament versus braided sutures in preventing miscarriage for women undergoing vaginal cervical cerclage. Patients and Methods: This trial was done in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, El-Hussein University Hospital, from January 2020 to November 2022. There were 201 participants in the study. Individuals were monitored in the obstetrics and gynecological clinics at El-Hussein University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University. Females with a singleton pregnancy and a cervical cerclage indicator were split evenly amongst receiving a monofilament or braided suture. Pregnancy loss was the fundamental result; secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes. Surgeons were permitted to employ any method they found most effective. Results: No significant variances were present in baseline characteristics, pregnancy and maternal outcomes, and neonatal outcomes between the two study groups. However, the Monofilament suture group had significantly more complications with cerclage removal. Conclusion: Both monofilament and braided sutures are effective and safe procedures with minimal side effects and complications. Although monofilament suture may cause more difficult removal and removal complications, it remains a viable option for treating cervical insufficiency.
单丝和编织线对需要阴道宫颈环扎的妇女妊娠损失率的影响比较
文章信息背景:早产影响11%的妊娠,并可能导致严重并发症。宫颈功能不全是早产的常见原因,也可以使用不同类型的缝合线进行阴道宫颈环扎治疗。观察研究表明,与编织缝合线相比,单丝缝合线可以减少妊娠损失,但需要随机对照研究来证实这一发现。工作目的:该研究旨在评估单丝与编织缝合线在预防阴道宫颈环扎妇女流产方面的疗效。患者和方法:该试验于2020年1月至2022年11月在侯赛因大学医院妇产科进行。该研究共有201名参与者。在爱资哈尔大学医学院侯赛因大学医院的产科和妇科诊所对个人进行了监测。单胎妊娠和宫颈环扎指标的女性在接受单丝或编织缝合时被均匀分开。流产是根本的结果;次要结果包括产妇和新生儿的结果。外科医生被允许使用他们认为最有效的任何方法。结果:两个研究组在基线特征、妊娠和产妇结局以及新生儿结局方面没有显著差异。然而,单丝缝合组的环扎术并发症明显增多。结论:单丝和编织缝合都是有效和安全的手术方法,副作用和并发症最小。尽管单丝缝合可能会导致更困难的切除和切除并发症,但它仍然是治疗宫颈功能不全的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信