Modeling the effect of moisture stress on the shift in optimal and maximum temperatures for germination of Malva parviflora L. seeds: Introducing a new hydrothermal time model

M. R. M. Telavat, S. A. Siadat, A. Derakhshan, S. Safarkhanzadeh
{"title":"Modeling the effect of moisture stress on the shift in optimal and maximum temperatures for germination of Malva parviflora L. seeds: Introducing a new hydrothermal time model","authors":"M. R. M. Telavat, S. A. Siadat, A. Derakhshan, S. Safarkhanzadeh","doi":"10.22077/ESCS.2020.2806.1732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction \nSeed germination is largely controlled by the temperature and moisture content of the seedbed. Therefore, hydrothermal time models have been widely used to describe seed germination patterns in response to temperature and water potential (Ψ) of the seedbed. The majority of these models assume a Normal distribution for base water potential (Ψb(g)) to describe the variation in time to germination. In some of these models, it is assumed that the thermoinhibition of germination induced by the shift in Ψb(g) to more positive values occur only at temperatures above the optimum (To) and that the To is independent of drought stress levels. In this study, the Weibull hydrothermal time was used to quantify the Ψb(g) changes in response to temperature and to model the effect of drought stress on the shift in the optimal (To(g)) and maximum (Tm(g)) temperatures for different germination fractions of malva parviflora seeds. \n  \nMaterials and methods \nThe experiment was conducted at the Seed Technology Laboratory of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan in 2016. Germination test was performed at eight constant temperatures of 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36 (± 0.2) °C in light/dark conditions (12 h/12 h). In each of the above temperature regimes, seed germination response to different levels of drought stress, i.e. osmotic solutions with concentrations of 0, -0.2, -0.4, -0.6, -0.8 and -0.1 MPa was evaluated. Germination test was performed with four replications (each Petri dish as one replicate). In each replicate, 50 seeds were placed on a layer of Whatman No 1 filter paper in a 9 cm glass Petri dish, and then moistened with 7 ml distilled water or other osmotic solutions. The number of germinated seeds was counted twice every day until germination stopped at each temperature regime (when no germination occurred for 5 consecutive days). All models, having been formulated into the hydrotime and then hydrothermal models, were fitted to data using PROC NLMIXED procedure of SAS software version 9.4. \n  \nResults and discussion \nWhile Ψb(g) showed a linear increase in the temperature range between Tb (base temperature) and Tm(g), the hydrotime constant (θH) decreased nonlinearly in response to increasing temperature. Based on the relationship between Ψb(g) and θH, the shape of the germination rate (GR(g)) response to temperature in the hydrothermal time model was curvilinear. The model estimated the values of θHT (hydrothermal time constant), Tb, Ψbase (base water potential at Tb), and KT (slope of the Ψb(g) response to temperature) as 1800.04 MPa °C h, 4.20 °C, -2.46 MPa, and 0.064 MPa °C-1, respectively. Both To(g) and Tm(g) decreased proportionally with increasing drought intensity and became cooler for higher germination percentiles. For example, the estimated To(50) (optimal temperature for the median) for M. parviflora seeds germinated under no water stress (Ψ=0 MPa) was 23.38 °C but dropped to 15.59 °C as water availability became minimum (Ψ=-1.0 MPa). Similarly, it was estimated that 50% of seeds would be able to germination at (or below) 42.55 °C form zero osmotic potential (Tm(50) at Ψ=0 MPa) but to attain the same germination level at -1.0 MPa, temperature should never exceed 26.99 °C (Tm(50) at Ψ=-1.0 MPa). \n  \nConclusion \nThe hydrothermal time model not only gave good fits to germination data but also showed some adaptive properties of M. parviflora seeds to different temperature and moisture environments. With the increasing severity drought, the To(g) and Tm(g) shifted to cooler values, which mean that the seeds were able to germinate at a narrower temperature range under drought conditions.","PeriodicalId":31378,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22077/ESCS.2020.2806.1732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Seed germination is largely controlled by the temperature and moisture content of the seedbed. Therefore, hydrothermal time models have been widely used to describe seed germination patterns in response to temperature and water potential (Ψ) of the seedbed. The majority of these models assume a Normal distribution for base water potential (Ψb(g)) to describe the variation in time to germination. In some of these models, it is assumed that the thermoinhibition of germination induced by the shift in Ψb(g) to more positive values occur only at temperatures above the optimum (To) and that the To is independent of drought stress levels. In this study, the Weibull hydrothermal time was used to quantify the Ψb(g) changes in response to temperature and to model the effect of drought stress on the shift in the optimal (To(g)) and maximum (Tm(g)) temperatures for different germination fractions of malva parviflora seeds.   Materials and methods The experiment was conducted at the Seed Technology Laboratory of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan in 2016. Germination test was performed at eight constant temperatures of 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36 (± 0.2) °C in light/dark conditions (12 h/12 h). In each of the above temperature regimes, seed germination response to different levels of drought stress, i.e. osmotic solutions with concentrations of 0, -0.2, -0.4, -0.6, -0.8 and -0.1 MPa was evaluated. Germination test was performed with four replications (each Petri dish as one replicate). In each replicate, 50 seeds were placed on a layer of Whatman No 1 filter paper in a 9 cm glass Petri dish, and then moistened with 7 ml distilled water or other osmotic solutions. The number of germinated seeds was counted twice every day until germination stopped at each temperature regime (when no germination occurred for 5 consecutive days). All models, having been formulated into the hydrotime and then hydrothermal models, were fitted to data using PROC NLMIXED procedure of SAS software version 9.4.   Results and discussion While Ψb(g) showed a linear increase in the temperature range between Tb (base temperature) and Tm(g), the hydrotime constant (θH) decreased nonlinearly in response to increasing temperature. Based on the relationship between Ψb(g) and θH, the shape of the germination rate (GR(g)) response to temperature in the hydrothermal time model was curvilinear. The model estimated the values of θHT (hydrothermal time constant), Tb, Ψbase (base water potential at Tb), and KT (slope of the Ψb(g) response to temperature) as 1800.04 MPa °C h, 4.20 °C, -2.46 MPa, and 0.064 MPa °C-1, respectively. Both To(g) and Tm(g) decreased proportionally with increasing drought intensity and became cooler for higher germination percentiles. For example, the estimated To(50) (optimal temperature for the median) for M. parviflora seeds germinated under no water stress (Ψ=0 MPa) was 23.38 °C but dropped to 15.59 °C as water availability became minimum (Ψ=-1.0 MPa). Similarly, it was estimated that 50% of seeds would be able to germination at (or below) 42.55 °C form zero osmotic potential (Tm(50) at Ψ=0 MPa) but to attain the same germination level at -1.0 MPa, temperature should never exceed 26.99 °C (Tm(50) at Ψ=-1.0 MPa).   Conclusion The hydrothermal time model not only gave good fits to germination data but also showed some adaptive properties of M. parviflora seeds to different temperature and moisture environments. With the increasing severity drought, the To(g) and Tm(g) shifted to cooler values, which mean that the seeds were able to germinate at a narrower temperature range under drought conditions.
水分胁迫对小叶锦葵种子萌发最佳温度和最高温度变化的影响:引入一种新的热液时间模型
种子的萌发在很大程度上受苗床温度和湿度的控制。因此,热液时间模型被广泛用于描述种子萌发模式对温度和水势的响应(Ψ)。这些模型中的大多数假设基本水势(Ψb(g))为正态分布,以描述发芽时间的变化。在其中一些模型中,假设Ψb(g)向更正的值转变引起的萌发热抑制仅发生在高于最佳(to)的温度下,并且to与干旱胁迫水平无关。本研究采用Weibull热液时间来量化Ψb(g)对温度的响应变化,并模拟干旱胁迫对不同种子萌发组分的最佳(to (g))和最高(Tm(g))温度变化的影响。材料与方法实验于2016年在胡齐斯坦农业科学与自然资源大学种子技术实验室进行。在8、12、16、20、24、28、32和36(±0.2)°C的光照/黑暗条件下(12 h/12 h)进行萌发试验。在上述每种温度下,评估种子对不同水平干旱胁迫(即浓度为0、-0.2、-0.4、-0.6、-0.8和-0.1 MPa的渗透溶液)的萌发响应。发芽试验设4个重复(每个培养皿为1个重复)。在每个重复中,将50粒种子放在9厘米玻璃培养皿中的Whatman 1号滤纸上,然后用7毫升蒸馏水或其他渗透溶液湿润。每天计数两次发芽种子的数量,直到在每个温度条件下停止发芽(连续5天没有发芽)。将所有模型分别拟合为水时间模型和水热模型,利用SAS软件9.4版的PROC nlmix程序对数据进行拟合。Ψb(g)在Tb(碱温)和Tm(g)之间的温度范围内呈线性增加,而水时间常数(θH)随温度升高呈非线性减小。根据Ψb(g)与θH的关系,热液时间模型中萌发率(GR(g))对温度的响应呈曲线形状。该模型估计θHT(热液时间常数)、Tb、Ψbase (Tb处的碱水势)和KT (Ψb(g)对温度响应的斜率)分别为1800.04 MPa°C h、4.20℃、-2.46 MPa和0.064 MPa°C-1。随着干旱强度的增加,To(g)和Tm(g)呈比例下降,萌发百分位数越高,温度越低。例如,在无水分胁迫(Ψ=0 MPa)条件下,小叶草种子萌发的to50(中值为最佳温度)为23.38℃,但当水分可用性达到最低(Ψ=-1.0 MPa)时,to50降至15.59℃。同样,估计50%的种子能够在(或低于)42.55°C时萌发,形成零渗透势(Ψ=0 MPa时Tm(50)),但要在-1.0 MPa时达到相同的萌发水平,温度不应超过26.99°C (Ψ=-1.0 MPa时Tm(50))。结论水热时间模型不仅能很好地拟合小叶草种子的萌发数据,而且还能显示出小叶草种子对不同温度和湿度环境的适应性。随着干旱程度的增加,To(g)和Tm(g)向较冷的值转移,这意味着在干旱条件下种子能够在较窄的温度范围内发芽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信