Comparison of different CFD approaches for the simulation of developing free surface two-phase flow in straight and bent pipes

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
A. Döß, T. Höhne, M. Schubert, U. Hampel
{"title":"Comparison of different CFD approaches for the simulation of developing free surface two-phase flow in straight and bent pipes","authors":"A. Döß, T. Höhne, M. Schubert, U. Hampel","doi":"10.1515/cppm-2023-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two-phase flows in feed pipes of thermal separation columns have complex flow patterns and are difficult to predict during sizing and design for geometries with non-straight pipes. Numerical simulation codes have only been validated for very few pipe geometries. This work benchmarks the state-of-the-art Volume-of-Fluid model (VoF) and the Algebraic Interfacial Area Density model (AIAD) for the simulation of two-phase flows with the Eulerian/Eulerian CFD approach for straight pipes and horizontal bends as well as for different pipe diameters and flow rates. Both models are compared and shortcomings of the predicted velocity fields from AIAD in the vicinity of horizontal bends are highlighted. While phase dynamics, e.g., for wavy or disperse flows, are not well reproduced by either model, the phase distribution patterns in straight tubes and bends agree reasonably well with experimental data. Regardless of the geometry, better void fraction prediction is obtained for higher flow velocities and the larger pipe diameter. From the numerical results, recommendations for the selection of feed inlet devices are derived.","PeriodicalId":9935,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Product and Process Modeling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Product and Process Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2023-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Two-phase flows in feed pipes of thermal separation columns have complex flow patterns and are difficult to predict during sizing and design for geometries with non-straight pipes. Numerical simulation codes have only been validated for very few pipe geometries. This work benchmarks the state-of-the-art Volume-of-Fluid model (VoF) and the Algebraic Interfacial Area Density model (AIAD) for the simulation of two-phase flows with the Eulerian/Eulerian CFD approach for straight pipes and horizontal bends as well as for different pipe diameters and flow rates. Both models are compared and shortcomings of the predicted velocity fields from AIAD in the vicinity of horizontal bends are highlighted. While phase dynamics, e.g., for wavy or disperse flows, are not well reproduced by either model, the phase distribution patterns in straight tubes and bends agree reasonably well with experimental data. Regardless of the geometry, better void fraction prediction is obtained for higher flow velocities and the larger pipe diameter. From the numerical results, recommendations for the selection of feed inlet devices are derived.
不同CFD方法在直管与弯管自由表面两相流动模拟中的比较
摘要热分离塔进料管内的两相流流型复杂,在非直管几何尺寸的选型和设计中难以预测。数值模拟代码只对很少的管道几何形状进行了验证。这项工作以最先进的流体体积模型(VoF)和代数界面面积密度模型(AIAD)为基准,采用欧拉/欧拉CFD方法模拟直管和水平弯道以及不同管径和流速的两相流动。比较了两种模型,指出了AIAD预测水平弯道附近速度场的不足。虽然两种模型都不能很好地再现相动力学,例如波浪流或分散流,但直管和弯道中的相分布模式与实验数据相当吻合。无论几何形状如何,当流速较大、管径较大时,孔隙率预测效果较好。根据数值计算结果,提出了进料装置选择的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical Product and Process Modeling
Chemical Product and Process Modeling ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Chemical Product and Process Modeling (CPPM) is a quarterly journal that publishes theoretical and applied research on product and process design modeling, simulation and optimization. Thanks to its international editorial board, the journal assembles the best papers from around the world on to cover the gap between product and process. The journal brings together chemical and process engineering researchers, practitioners, and software developers in a new forum for the international modeling and simulation community. Topics: equation oriented and modular simulation optimization technology for process and materials design, new modeling techniques shortcut modeling and design approaches performance of commercial and in-house simulation and optimization tools challenges faced in industrial product and process simulation and optimization computational fluid dynamics environmental process, food and pharmaceutical modeling topics drawn from the substantial areas of overlap between modeling and mathematics applied to chemical products and processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信