Flipping the Academic Conference, or How We Wrote a Peer-Reviewed Journal Article in a Day

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Alternatives Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI:10.1177/0304375419898577

I. Baron, Jonathan Havercroft, Isaac Kamola, J. Koomen, A. Prichard

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Is it possible to write a publishable, peer-reviewed academic paper in a day? We attempted this task in 2016, motivated by a desire to find new ways of doing academic work in the face of our growing sense of alienation within the neoliberal academy. This article provides our analysis of academic alienation and an auto-ethnography of our experiment. We discuss four lessons learned: (1) knowledge as a social relation, (2) time and the academy, (3) gender and collaborative writing, and (4) the contradictions and possibilities of anarchy and authorship. We also offer practical advice for scholars looking to engage in similar collaborations.

查看原文本刊更多论文

翻转学术会议，或者我们如何在一天内写一篇同行评议的期刊文章

有可能在一天之内写出一篇可发表的、同行评议的学术论文吗?我们在2016年尝试了这项任务，动机是面对我们在新自由主义学术界日益增长的疏离感，希望找到新的学术工作方式。本文提供了我们对学术异化的分析和我们实验的自我民族志。我们讨论了从中得到的四个教训:(1)知识作为一种社会关系;(2)时间与学院;(3)性别与合作写作;(4)无政府状态与作者身份的矛盾与可能性。我们还为希望参与类似合作的学者提供实用建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Alternatives INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： A peer-reviewed journal, Alternatives explores the possibilities of new forms of political practice and identity under increasingly global conditions. Specifically, the editors focus on the changing relationships between local political practices and identities and emerging forms of global economy, culture, and polity. Published in association with the Center for the Study of Developing Societies (India).