{"title":"«At-tavarikh ar-rusum ad-dagistania»: codification of Customary law in the Dagestan Province","authors":"I. Chmilevskaya","doi":"10.22363/2312-8127-2023-15-1-98-107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the territories of the North Caucasus became part of the Russian Empire and Dagestan Province was formed in 1861, the colonial authorities faced the necessity of the spread of common legal norms and the judicial system in the region. It was decided to turn to the Customary law, which was popular enough among the population (Arabic. ‘adat ) and on its basis to draw up a unifi legal code. Two Arabic-language manuscripts and one Russian-language document have come down to nowadays, presumably representing attempts to codify ‘adat . The purpose of the article is to review and compare texts using historical and textual analysis answering following questions: what legal systems are refl in the «At-tavarikh ar-rusum ad-dagistania»? How did the imperial authorities manipulate them and what was the result of the interaction of local forms of law and colonial ones? As a result of the study, it was revealed that the documents created by Russian offi included not only the legal norms of the residents of North Caucasus, but also references to the imperial legal system and shari‘a . Despite the proliferation of courts under customary law in the region, we do not fi evidence of the use of the codes in question in them, which is probably due to their unpopularity due to signifi discrepancies with local ‘adat norms.","PeriodicalId":34723,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of World History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of World History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2023-15-1-98-107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
When the territories of the North Caucasus became part of the Russian Empire and Dagestan Province was formed in 1861, the colonial authorities faced the necessity of the spread of common legal norms and the judicial system in the region. It was decided to turn to the Customary law, which was popular enough among the population (Arabic. ‘adat ) and on its basis to draw up a unifi legal code. Two Arabic-language manuscripts and one Russian-language document have come down to nowadays, presumably representing attempts to codify ‘adat . The purpose of the article is to review and compare texts using historical and textual analysis answering following questions: what legal systems are refl in the «At-tavarikh ar-rusum ad-dagistania»? How did the imperial authorities manipulate them and what was the result of the interaction of local forms of law and colonial ones? As a result of the study, it was revealed that the documents created by Russian offi included not only the legal norms of the residents of North Caucasus, but also references to the imperial legal system and shari‘a . Despite the proliferation of courts under customary law in the region, we do not fi evidence of the use of the codes in question in them, which is probably due to their unpopularity due to signifi discrepancies with local ‘adat norms.
当北高加索地区成为俄罗斯帝国的一部分,达吉斯坦省于1861年成立时,殖民当局面临着在该地区传播共同法律规范和司法系统的必要性。决定求助于在民众中足够受欢迎的习惯法(阿拉伯语。adat),并在此基础上制定一部统一的法典。两份阿拉伯语手稿和一份俄语文件流传至今,可能代表着编纂“adat”的尝试。这篇文章的目的是通过历史和文本分析来回顾和比较文本,回答以下问题:《在塔瓦里赫arrusum ad dagistana》中反映了哪些法律制度?帝国当局是如何操纵它们的?地方法律形式和殖民法律形式相互作用的结果是什么?研究结果表明,俄罗斯官员创建的文件不仅包括北高加索居民的法律规范,还提到了帝国法律制度和伊斯兰教法。尽管该地区习惯法下的法院数量激增,但我们没有证据表明其中使用了有问题的法典,这可能是因为它们与当地规范存在重大差异而不受欢迎。