Beyond the Universalist and Cultural Relativist Debate

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Adetokunbo Johnson
{"title":"Beyond the Universalist and Cultural Relativist Debate","authors":"Adetokunbo Johnson","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article explores how the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (The Protocol or African Women’s Protocol), concerned with realising gender equality in Africa, can guarantee gender equality yet retain African women’s valued cultural identity within customary African marriages. These marriages have certain cultural practices that are fundamental to their existence. This exploration is significant, bearing in mind the tensions raised by the contentious universalist versus cultural relativist debates on how human rights are understood. These tensions are evident where on the one hand, universalists argue that certain cultural practices that usually occur within customary African marriages undermine gender equality. On the other hand, cultural relativists maintain that these customary marriage practices are culturally acceptable and integral to the cultural identity of African women. Based on these contentions, this article identifies the Protocol’s strategies employed to douse these tensions within the customary African marriage context. These strategies are determined by examining the treaty’s marriage-related obligations outlined in Article 6 (a–c).","PeriodicalId":41565,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-bja10079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores how the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (The Protocol or African Women’s Protocol), concerned with realising gender equality in Africa, can guarantee gender equality yet retain African women’s valued cultural identity within customary African marriages. These marriages have certain cultural practices that are fundamental to their existence. This exploration is significant, bearing in mind the tensions raised by the contentious universalist versus cultural relativist debates on how human rights are understood. These tensions are evident where on the one hand, universalists argue that certain cultural practices that usually occur within customary African marriages undermine gender equality. On the other hand, cultural relativists maintain that these customary marriage practices are culturally acceptable and integral to the cultural identity of African women. Based on these contentions, this article identifies the Protocol’s strategies employed to douse these tensions within the customary African marriage context. These strategies are determined by examining the treaty’s marriage-related obligations outlined in Article 6 (a–c).
超越普遍主义与文化相对主义之争
本文探讨了《非洲人权和人民权利宪章关于非洲妇女权利的议定书》(《议定书》或《非洲妇女议定书》)如何在实现非洲性别平等的同时保证性别平等,同时在非洲传统婚姻中保留非洲妇女的宝贵文化身份。这些婚姻有一定的文化习俗,这是他们存在的基础。考虑到关于如何理解人权的有争议的普遍主义与文化相对主义辩论所引发的紧张局势,这一探索是重要的。一方面,普遍主义者认为,非洲传统婚姻中通常出现的某些文化习俗破坏了性别平等。另一方面,文化相对主义者认为,这些传统的婚姻习俗在文化上是可以接受的,是非洲妇女文化认同的组成部分。根据这些争论,本文确定了议定书在非洲传统婚姻背景下为缓和这些紧张局势所采用的战略。这些战略是通过审查条约第6 (a-c)条中概述的与婚姻有关的义务来确定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Legal Studies (AJLS) is a peer-reviewed and interdisciplinary academic journal focusing on human rights and rule of law issues in Africa as analyzed by lawyers, economists, political scientists and others drawn from throughout the continent and the world. The journal, which was established by the Africa Law Institute and is now co-published in collaboration with Brill | Nijhoff, aims to serve as the leading forum for the thoughtful and scholarly engagement of a broad range of complex issues at the intersection of law, public policy and social change in Africa. AJLS places emphasis on presenting a diversity of perspectives on fundamental, long-term, systemic problems of human rights and governance, as well as emerging issues, and possible solutions to them. Towards this end, AJLS encourages critical reflections that are based on empirical observations and experience as well as theoretical and multi-disciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信