Falso consenso: el fantasma de la buena fe en el artículo 7(1) de la CISG

Q4 Social Sciences
Enrique Varsi Raspigliosi
{"title":"Falso consenso: el fantasma de la buena fe en el artículo 7(1) de la CISG","authors":"Enrique Varsi Raspigliosi","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.139-178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"7(1) the Abstract: Good faith is one the matters that divides Civil Law from Common Law systems and is a starting point to discuss on the underlying philosophy found behind the pro-good faith and anti-good faith approaches. Taking this context into consideration, the CISG adopted a restrictive model of good faith (Common Law-friendly, in principle) and so it was expressed in its text, being article 7(1) the only provision that makes reference to good faith and regarding the interpretation of the CISG. However, since it was a false consensus, the story did not end there, and the ghost of civilian good faith continues to haunt the CISG facilities, and thus, even if it is not physically present, its presence could be felt through the lex mercatoria pursuant to article 9 CISG.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prudentia Iuris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.139-178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

7(1) the Abstract: Good faith is one the matters that divides Civil Law from Common Law systems and is a starting point to discuss on the underlying philosophy found behind the pro-good faith and anti-good faith approaches. Taking this context into consideration, the CISG adopted a restrictive model of good faith (Common Law-friendly, in principle) and so it was expressed in its text, being article 7(1) the only provision that makes reference to good faith and regarding the interpretation of the CISG. However, since it was a false consensus, the story did not end there, and the ghost of civilian good faith continues to haunt the CISG facilities, and thus, even if it is not physically present, its presence could be felt through the lex mercatoria pursuant to article 9 CISG.
虚假共识:《销售公约》第7(1)条中的诚信幽灵
7(1)摘要:诚信是民法与英美法系的区别之一,也是讨论支持诚信和反对诚信方法背后的基本哲学的起点。考虑到这一点,《销售公约》采用了一种限制性的善意模式(原则上对普通法友好),因此在其案文中有所表述,即第7(1)条是唯一提及善意并涉及《销售公约的解释的条款。然而,由于这是一个虚假的共识,故事并没有就此结束,平民善意的幽灵继续困扰着《销售公约》的设施,因此,即使它不在现场,根据《销售公约第9条,也可以通过商法感受到它的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prudentia Iuris
Prudentia Iuris Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信