Misguided Opposition to Multiplicity Adjustment Remains a Problem

Q3 Mathematics

Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods Pub Date : 2020-10-12 DOI:10.22237/jmasm/1556669400

Andrew V. Frane

引用次数: 5

Abstract

Fallacious arguments against multiplicity adjustment have been cited with increasing frequency to defend unadjusted tests. These arguments and their enduring impact are discussed in this paper.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对多样性调整的错误反对仍然是一个问题

反对多重调整的谬论被越来越频繁地引用来为未经调整的测试辩护。本文讨论了这些争论及其持久的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods STATISTICS & PROBABILITY-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods is an independent, peer-reviewed, open access journal designed to provide an outlet for the scholarly works of applied nonparametric or parametric statisticians, data analysts, researchers, classical or modern psychometricians, and quantitative or qualitative methodologists/evaluators.