Diet Composition of Bats in a Human-Modified Tropical Landscape

Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI:10.3161/15081109ACC2021.23.2.009
Cecília Kruszynski, R. de Andrade Moral, Cristiane H Millan, T. R. Diniz‐Reis, M. Mello, P. D. de Camargo
{"title":"Diet Composition of Bats in a Human-Modified Tropical Landscape","authors":"Cecília Kruszynski, R. de Andrade Moral, Cristiane H Millan, T. R. Diniz‐Reis, M. Mello, P. D. de Camargo","doi":"10.3161/15081109ACC2021.23.2.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human-modified landscapes are often composed of small and isolated natural habitat fragments immersed in agricultural and urban matrices. Within them, ecosystem services provided by wildlife, such as pest insect suppression, may decrease or even be lost leading to a substantial increase in agricultural production costs. Pest insect suppression by bats has been identified as an essential ecosystem service but remains poorly investigated. For example, we still lack a basic understanding of the proportion of pest insects that comprises the diet of many bat species. Here, we explored the diet composition of eight Brazilian bat species (78 individuals) in a human-modified landscape through the analysis of stable carbon (13C) and nitrogen (15N) isotopes. Bats were categorised into guilds: open-space aerial insectivores, narrow-space gleaning frugivores, or narrow-space gleaning nectarivores. We divided the insects collected into three groups depending on their δ13C values: forest, mixed, and pest insects. We found that open-space insectivorous bats had the highest proportion of insects in total in their diet — consuming primarily from the forest group (56%) and the pest group (34%). Interestingly, narrow-space gleaning frugivores also consumed pest insects (almost 20%). The narrow-space gleaning nectarivores had traces of insects in their diet, yet the actual proportion was inconclusive. Even though bats were from different guilds, with diets consisting mainly of plants and insects, the δ15N indicated that they fitted to similar trophic levels, as secondary consumers. Therefore, the trophic level of nectarivorous and frugivorous bats showed a more generalist diet than previously assumed. The proportion of forest insects in the diet of open-space aerial insectivores may indicate the importance of small forest patches as food resources for wildlife such as the ones included in human-modified landscapes. The bats' contribution to this ecosystem service could improve the economic conservation value of Neotropical bats in human-modified landscapes.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3161/15081109ACC2021.23.2.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human-modified landscapes are often composed of small and isolated natural habitat fragments immersed in agricultural and urban matrices. Within them, ecosystem services provided by wildlife, such as pest insect suppression, may decrease or even be lost leading to a substantial increase in agricultural production costs. Pest insect suppression by bats has been identified as an essential ecosystem service but remains poorly investigated. For example, we still lack a basic understanding of the proportion of pest insects that comprises the diet of many bat species. Here, we explored the diet composition of eight Brazilian bat species (78 individuals) in a human-modified landscape through the analysis of stable carbon (13C) and nitrogen (15N) isotopes. Bats were categorised into guilds: open-space aerial insectivores, narrow-space gleaning frugivores, or narrow-space gleaning nectarivores. We divided the insects collected into three groups depending on their δ13C values: forest, mixed, and pest insects. We found that open-space insectivorous bats had the highest proportion of insects in total in their diet — consuming primarily from the forest group (56%) and the pest group (34%). Interestingly, narrow-space gleaning frugivores also consumed pest insects (almost 20%). The narrow-space gleaning nectarivores had traces of insects in their diet, yet the actual proportion was inconclusive. Even though bats were from different guilds, with diets consisting mainly of plants and insects, the δ15N indicated that they fitted to similar trophic levels, as secondary consumers. Therefore, the trophic level of nectarivorous and frugivorous bats showed a more generalist diet than previously assumed. The proportion of forest insects in the diet of open-space aerial insectivores may indicate the importance of small forest patches as food resources for wildlife such as the ones included in human-modified landscapes. The bats' contribution to this ecosystem service could improve the economic conservation value of Neotropical bats in human-modified landscapes.
分享
查看原文
人类改造的热带景观中蝙蝠的饮食组成
人为改造的景观通常由淹没在农业和城市基质中的小而孤立的自然生境碎片组成。在其中,野生动物提供的生态系统服务,如防治病虫害,可能减少甚至丧失,导致农业生产成本大幅增加。蝙蝠对害虫的抑制已被确定为一种重要的生态系统服务,但调查仍然很少。例如,我们仍然对许多蝙蝠种类的食物中有害昆虫的比例缺乏基本的了解。在这里,我们通过分析稳定的碳(13C)和氮(15N)同位素,探讨了人类改造景观中8种巴西蝙蝠(78只)的饮食组成。蝙蝠被分为几个行会:开放空间的空中食虫动物、狭窄空间的食果动物和狭窄空间的食蜜动物。根据其δ13C值,我们将收集到的昆虫分为三类:森林昆虫、混合昆虫和害虫。我们发现,开放空间食虫蝙蝠的饮食中昆虫的比例最高,主要来自森林组(56%)和害虫组(34%)。有趣的是,狭窄空间的食果动物也吃害虫(近20%)。狭窄空间的采蜜动物在它们的饮食中有昆虫的痕迹,但实际的比例尚无定论。尽管蝙蝠来自不同的行会,其饮食主要由植物和昆虫组成,但δ15N表明它们适合相似的营养水平,作为次级消费者。因此,食蚁兽和果食蚁兽的营养水平显示出比以前假设的更广泛的饮食。森林昆虫在开放空间空中食虫动物饮食中的比例可能表明小森林斑块作为野生动物食物资源的重要性,例如人类改造景观中的野生动物。蝙蝠对生态系统服务的贡献可以提高新热带蝙蝠在人类改造景观中的经济保护价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信