Driving for Work Crashes: A Systems Analysis

IF 0.4 Q4 TRANSPORTATION
Ali Raja, R. Thorne, R. Luther, Claire Tedestedt George, Jackson Blewden, Emily Mackie, Eileen Li, H. Mackie, Simon Douglas
{"title":"Driving for Work Crashes: A Systems Analysis","authors":"Ali Raja, R. Thorne, R. Luther, Claire Tedestedt George, Jackson Blewden, Emily Mackie, Eileen Li, H. Mackie, Simon Douglas","doi":"10.33492/jrs-d-22-00049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Work-related road safety is a government priority. A Safe System analysis of 300 driving for work (DFW) crashes was carried out, along with an exploratory socio-technical analysis of one significant case to better understand the context around DFW crashes. The Safe System analysis showed three distinct crash types: 1) multiple vehicle crashes often involving work vans, utes, and SUVs in side impact crashes; 2) vulnerable road users often involving professional drivers; and 3) single vehicle crashes involving people driving vans or light trucks for work losing control on rural roads with fatigue, non-seat belt use, and speed often implicated. There was a range of unique characteristics of DFW crashes, in particular, injuries to others who were implicated in DFW crashes but not those DFW themselves. Socio-technical systems analyses show promise for understanding the context around DFW crashes, but arrangements for better data access, coordination, and use are needed.","PeriodicalId":53198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Road Safety-JRS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Road Safety-JRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33492/jrs-d-22-00049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Work-related road safety is a government priority. A Safe System analysis of 300 driving for work (DFW) crashes was carried out, along with an exploratory socio-technical analysis of one significant case to better understand the context around DFW crashes. The Safe System analysis showed three distinct crash types: 1) multiple vehicle crashes often involving work vans, utes, and SUVs in side impact crashes; 2) vulnerable road users often involving professional drivers; and 3) single vehicle crashes involving people driving vans or light trucks for work losing control on rural roads with fatigue, non-seat belt use, and speed often implicated. There was a range of unique characteristics of DFW crashes, in particular, injuries to others who were implicated in DFW crashes but not those DFW themselves. Socio-technical systems analyses show promise for understanding the context around DFW crashes, but arrangements for better data access, coordination, and use are needed.
开车上班事故:系统分析
与工作相关的道路安全是政府的优先事项。研究人员对300起开车上班(DFW)事故进行了安全系统分析,并对一个重要案例进行了探索性社会技术分析,以更好地了解DFW事故的背景。安全系统分析显示了三种不同的碰撞类型:1)多车碰撞,通常涉及面包车、utes和suv的侧面碰撞;2)弱势道路使用者,通常涉及专业驾驶员;3)在农村道路上,驾驶面包车或轻型卡车的人因疲劳、不系安全带和速度过快而失去控制,导致的单人交通事故。DFW事故有一系列独特的特征,特别是对与DFW事故有关的其他人的伤害,而不是那些DFW本身。社会技术系统分析表明,有希望理解DFW崩溃的背景,但需要更好地安排数据访问、协调和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Road Safety-JRS
Journal of Road Safety-JRS TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信