Renter Nonpayment and Landlord Response: Evidence From COVID-19.

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-27 DOI:10.1080/10511482.2022.2085761
Michael Manville, Paavo Monkkonen, Michael C Lens, Richard Green
{"title":"Renter Nonpayment and Landlord Response: Evidence From COVID-19.","authors":"Michael Manville, Paavo Monkkonen, Michael C Lens, Richard Green","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2085761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How renters respond to economic hardship, and how landlords respond when tenants fail to make rent, are understudied questions, owing largely to limited data. We use experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic to begin answering these questions. Drawing on both new census data and two original surveys of renters in Los Angeles County, we test nine hypotheses about the sources of renter distress and landlord reactions to it. We find that lost work and lost income are the primary drivers of missed or late payments. Most tenants who fell behind entered into repayment plans with their landlords. Eviction threats were uncommon but increased as the pandemic persisted. Landlords were more likely to threaten eviction as tenants fell further behind, and smaller landlords were more likely than larger ones to cut tenant services and threaten or initiate evictions. Our evidence suggests that government income support helped tenants pay rent and thus helped stave off eviction threats. We also find that tenants took on other forms of debt, such as credit cards, loans from family, etc., to make rent. These debt burdens generally will not be relieved by housing assistance, and so require other policy responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11160939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Policy Debate","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2085761","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How renters respond to economic hardship, and how landlords respond when tenants fail to make rent, are understudied questions, owing largely to limited data. We use experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic to begin answering these questions. Drawing on both new census data and two original surveys of renters in Los Angeles County, we test nine hypotheses about the sources of renter distress and landlord reactions to it. We find that lost work and lost income are the primary drivers of missed or late payments. Most tenants who fell behind entered into repayment plans with their landlords. Eviction threats were uncommon but increased as the pandemic persisted. Landlords were more likely to threaten eviction as tenants fell further behind, and smaller landlords were more likely than larger ones to cut tenant services and threaten or initiate evictions. Our evidence suggests that government income support helped tenants pay rent and thus helped stave off eviction threats. We also find that tenants took on other forms of debt, such as credit cards, loans from family, etc., to make rent. These debt burdens generally will not be relieved by housing assistance, and so require other policy responses.

租房者不付款与房东反应:来自新冠肺炎的证据
主要由于数据有限,租房者如何应对经济困难以及房东在租房者无法支付房租时如何应对,这些问题都未得到充分研究。我们利用 COVID-19 大流行的经验开始回答这些问题。我们利用新的人口普查数据和对洛杉矶县租房者进行的两项原始调查,检验了有关租房者困境来源和房东应对措施的九项假设。我们发现,失去工作和失去收入是造成漏缴或迟缴房租的主要原因。大多数拖欠房租的租户都与房东签订了还款计划。驱逐威胁并不常见,但随着大流行病的持续,驱逐威胁有所增加。房东更有可能在租户进一步拖欠房租时威胁驱逐租户,小房东比大房东更有可能削减对租户的服务,威胁或主动驱逐租户。我们的证据表明,政府的收入支持有助于租户支付房租,从而避免了驱逐威胁。我们还发现,为了支付房租,租户还承担了其他形式的债务,如信用卡、家庭贷款等。这些债务负担一般不会因住房援助而减轻,因此需要采取其他政策应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
17.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Housing Policy Debate provides a venue for original research on U.S. housing policy. Subjects include affordable housing policy, fair housing policy, land use regulations influencing housing affordability, metropolitan development trends, and linkages among housing policy and energy, environmental, and transportation policy. Housing Policy Debate is published quarterly. Most issues feature a Forum section and an Articles section. The Forum, which highlights a current debate, features a central article and responding comments that represent a range of perspectives. All articles in the Forum and Articles sections undergo a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信