Editorial

IF 0.9 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES
A. Bach, Charlotte Kroløkke, Dag Heede, J. Herrmann
{"title":"Editorial","authors":"A. Bach, Charlotte Kroløkke, Dag Heede, J. Herrmann","doi":"10.1080/08038740.2021.2011040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this large volume we are happy to present a number of articles covering the fields of sociology, anthropology, literature, media studies and cultural studies representing four Nordic countries: Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland. As feminist and gender studies are being challenged, attacked and even forbidden by law at this time by conservative and right wing populist politicians, a demonstration of the variety and scope of the field in the Nordic countries and in the world is more important than ever. Not only have semi-authoritarian regimes in Eastern European countries like Poland and Hungary seen efforts to fundamentally delegitimize the production and dissemination of gender knowledge, so, too have progressive countries like Denmark. Ironically, these efforts testify to the importance of feminist and gender studies. Thus, on a positive note there is perhaps no better proof of the significance of these academic and political endeavours than to be considered a threat to the existing patriarchal power structures, structures that authoritarian and anti-democratic tendencies often exacerbate. We are, therefore, particularly happy to demonstrate that gender studies is not just alive and kicking; the field is continuously expanding with a variety of research, experimentation and debate across a wide range of academic disciplines. Common to this issue’s very different articles is that almost all of them have intersectional perspectives where gender and sometimes sexuality is connected to ”Norwegianess”, ”Danishness”, ”Swedishness” and ”Finnishness”. The modern Nordic welfare state is typically the main context for these multifaceted explorations. This issue’s opening article, “”Cake is not an attack on democracy.” Moving beyond carceral Pride and building queer coalitions in post-22/7 Norway” by Norwegian sociologist Elisabeth L. Engebretsen, is a critical discussion of the media coverage of the ”pieing” of a far-right wing politician at the Oslo Pride in 2016. The happening not only landed the queer-anarchist band Cistem Failure in jail but also was met with unanimous condemnation by the press across the political spectrum. The incident was generally viewed as a terrorist attack on Norwegian democracy and by implication as ”Non-Norwegian”. Little attention was paid to the political message of the non-binary provocateur and their project. The article questions this massive consensus and how dominant narratives make Cistem Failure’s alter-narratives unintelligible: “An anti-racist, intersectional politics of solidarity and collaborative justice is always already excluded from the mainstay of Pride Politics. In its stead, the one-dimensional discourse of liberal progress within a protective national territory fixes the ministerial pie-throwing as an uncivil aberration with a compulsory carceral consequence.” The next article, ”Gendered care, empathy and (un)doing difference in the Danish welfare state’s care managers approaching female caregivers of older immigrants” by Danish anthropologist Sara Lei Sparre, explores how care managers are often ethically challenged when dealing with immigrant families, especially in cases where daughters, daughters-in-law or young wives are paid by the state to care for older family members. The managers slip in and out of their roles as administrators, health professionals and morally concerned citizens and their empathy is ambiguous: “Although striving to undo difference and include these women in a community of independent Danish female citizens, they also tend to place them and their families in a different category than the majority population and thus risk further marginalizing them”. Swedishness, modernity and gender equality are explored by cultural studies scholars Klara Geodecke and Roger Klinth in their article: ”Selling Swedish Fathers: On Fatherhood, Gender equality and Swedishness in Strategic communication by the Swedish Institute”. Taking as their NORA—NORDIC JOURNAL OF FEMINIST AND GENDER RESEARCH 2021, VOL. 29, NO. 4, 231–233 https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2021.2011040","PeriodicalId":45485,"journal":{"name":"NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2021.2011040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this large volume we are happy to present a number of articles covering the fields of sociology, anthropology, literature, media studies and cultural studies representing four Nordic countries: Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland. As feminist and gender studies are being challenged, attacked and even forbidden by law at this time by conservative and right wing populist politicians, a demonstration of the variety and scope of the field in the Nordic countries and in the world is more important than ever. Not only have semi-authoritarian regimes in Eastern European countries like Poland and Hungary seen efforts to fundamentally delegitimize the production and dissemination of gender knowledge, so, too have progressive countries like Denmark. Ironically, these efforts testify to the importance of feminist and gender studies. Thus, on a positive note there is perhaps no better proof of the significance of these academic and political endeavours than to be considered a threat to the existing patriarchal power structures, structures that authoritarian and anti-democratic tendencies often exacerbate. We are, therefore, particularly happy to demonstrate that gender studies is not just alive and kicking; the field is continuously expanding with a variety of research, experimentation and debate across a wide range of academic disciplines. Common to this issue’s very different articles is that almost all of them have intersectional perspectives where gender and sometimes sexuality is connected to ”Norwegianess”, ”Danishness”, ”Swedishness” and ”Finnishness”. The modern Nordic welfare state is typically the main context for these multifaceted explorations. This issue’s opening article, “”Cake is not an attack on democracy.” Moving beyond carceral Pride and building queer coalitions in post-22/7 Norway” by Norwegian sociologist Elisabeth L. Engebretsen, is a critical discussion of the media coverage of the ”pieing” of a far-right wing politician at the Oslo Pride in 2016. The happening not only landed the queer-anarchist band Cistem Failure in jail but also was met with unanimous condemnation by the press across the political spectrum. The incident was generally viewed as a terrorist attack on Norwegian democracy and by implication as ”Non-Norwegian”. Little attention was paid to the political message of the non-binary provocateur and their project. The article questions this massive consensus and how dominant narratives make Cistem Failure’s alter-narratives unintelligible: “An anti-racist, intersectional politics of solidarity and collaborative justice is always already excluded from the mainstay of Pride Politics. In its stead, the one-dimensional discourse of liberal progress within a protective national territory fixes the ministerial pie-throwing as an uncivil aberration with a compulsory carceral consequence.” The next article, ”Gendered care, empathy and (un)doing difference in the Danish welfare state’s care managers approaching female caregivers of older immigrants” by Danish anthropologist Sara Lei Sparre, explores how care managers are often ethically challenged when dealing with immigrant families, especially in cases where daughters, daughters-in-law or young wives are paid by the state to care for older family members. The managers slip in and out of their roles as administrators, health professionals and morally concerned citizens and their empathy is ambiguous: “Although striving to undo difference and include these women in a community of independent Danish female citizens, they also tend to place them and their families in a different category than the majority population and thus risk further marginalizing them”. Swedishness, modernity and gender equality are explored by cultural studies scholars Klara Geodecke and Roger Klinth in their article: ”Selling Swedish Fathers: On Fatherhood, Gender equality and Swedishness in Strategic communication by the Swedish Institute”. Taking as their NORA—NORDIC JOURNAL OF FEMINIST AND GENDER RESEARCH 2021, VOL. 29, NO. 4, 231–233 https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2021.2011040
社论
在这本大卷中,我们很高兴呈现一些文章,涵盖社会学、人类学、文学、媒体研究和文化研究领域,代表四个北欧国家:挪威、丹麦、瑞典和芬兰。此时,女权主义和性别研究正受到保守派和右翼民粹主义政客的挑战、攻击,甚至被法律禁止,因此,在北欧国家和世界范围内展示这一领域的多样性和范围比以往任何时候都更为重要。波兰和匈牙利等东欧国家的半独裁政权不仅试图从根本上剥夺性别知识的生产和传播的合法性,丹麦等进步国家也是如此。具有讽刺意味的是,这些努力证明了女权主义和性别研究的重要性。因此,从积极的方面来看,也许没有比被视为对现有父权制权力结构的威胁更好的证据来证明这些学术和政治努力的重要性了,而专制和反民主倾向往往会加剧这种结构。因此,我们特别高兴地证明,性别研究不仅仅是活跃的;该领域正在不断扩展,在广泛的学术学科中进行了各种研究、实验和辩论。本期截然不同的文章的共同点是,几乎所有文章都有交叉的观点,其中性别,有时是性,与“挪威人”、“丹麦人”、《瑞典人》和“芬兰人”有关。现代北欧福利国家通常是这些多方面探索的主要背景。本期的开篇文章“蛋糕不是对民主的攻击”挪威社会学家伊丽莎白·L·恩格布雷森(Elisabeth L.Engebretsen。这一事件不仅让酷儿无政府主义乐队Cistem Failure入狱,还遭到了政治各界媒体的一致谴责。这起事件被普遍视为对挪威民主的恐怖袭击,其含义是“非挪威人”。很少有人注意到非二元挑衅者及其项目的政治信息。这篇文章质疑这种巨大的共识,以及主流叙事是如何让Cistem Failure的另一种叙事变得难以理解的:“反种族主义、团结和合作正义的交叉政治总是被排除在骄傲政治的主流之外。取而代之的是,关于在保护性国家领土内自由进步的一维话语将部长扔馅饼视为一种不文明的反常行为,并产生强制性的死刑后果。”下一篇文章《性别关怀》,丹麦人类学家Sara Lei Sparre的《丹麦福利国家护理管理人员对待老年移民女性护理人员的同理心和(联合国)差异》探讨了护理管理人员在与移民家庭打交道时如何经常受到道德挑战,尤其是在女儿、儿媳或年轻妻子由国家支付照顾老年家庭成员的费用的情况下。管理者在管理者的角色中进进出出,卫生专业人员和道德关注的公民,他们的同理心是模糊的:“尽管他们努力消除差异,将这些女性纳入一个独立的丹麦女性公民社区,但他们也倾向于将她们及其家人与大多数人放在不同的类别中,从而有可能进一步边缘化她们”。文化研究学者Klara Geodecke和Roger Klinth在他们的文章《出卖瑞典父亲:瑞典研究所战略传播中的父亲身份、性别平等和瑞典性》中探讨了瑞典性、现代性和性别平等。以《女性与性别研究杂志2021》第29卷第4期231–233作为他们的常态https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2021.2011040
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信