Nurse Rocks as a Minimum-Input Restoration Technique for the Cactus Opuntia basilaris

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Lindsay P. Chiquoine, J. Greenwood, S. R. Abella, J. F. Weigand
{"title":"Nurse Rocks as a Minimum-Input Restoration Technique for the Cactus Opuntia basilaris","authors":"Lindsay P. Chiquoine, J. Greenwood, S. R. Abella, J. F. Weigand","doi":"10.3368/er.40.1.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much plant recruitment in deserts occurs in shaded microsites below canopies of mature perennial plants. Absence of “nurse plants” from disturbed sites often hinders ecological recovery. Given uncertainty and expense of directly restoring live plants in deserts, we explored using abiotic structures—nurse rocks— as a restoration option for reestablishing Opuntia basilaris (beavertail pricklypear) on a disturbed site in the Sonoran Desert, of the U.S. Wild populations at this site were strictly associated with large varnished surface rocks. To examine whether rocks functioned similarly as nurses for O. basilaris recruitment in disturbed and undisturbed reference habitats, we transplanted 30 rooted individuals each into habitat in which large varnished surface rocks were removed and into nearby undisturbed habitat. Within habitats, half the individuals were transplanted into open (no rocks) or rock (rocks surrounding transplants) microsites. In the first 15 months after planting, which had average precipitation, transplant survival did not differ between microsite types in either habitat but functional measures were influenced positively by nurse rocks. Nurse rocks sharply increased vegetative growth in 91.7% of transplants in undisturbed habitat and in flowering occurrence in 28.6% of transplants in disturbed habitat. Nurse rocks became even more important during extreme drought as the experiment progressed. By 27 months after planting, 2× (disturbed habitat) and 8× (undisturbed habitat) more transplants survived with nurse rocks compared to without. As a low-cost technique utilizing on-site material, nurse rocks show promise for enhancing revegetation success on disturbed desert sites, especially during drought.","PeriodicalId":11492,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Restoration","volume":"40 1","pages":"53 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.40.1.53","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much plant recruitment in deserts occurs in shaded microsites below canopies of mature perennial plants. Absence of “nurse plants” from disturbed sites often hinders ecological recovery. Given uncertainty and expense of directly restoring live plants in deserts, we explored using abiotic structures—nurse rocks— as a restoration option for reestablishing Opuntia basilaris (beavertail pricklypear) on a disturbed site in the Sonoran Desert, of the U.S. Wild populations at this site were strictly associated with large varnished surface rocks. To examine whether rocks functioned similarly as nurses for O. basilaris recruitment in disturbed and undisturbed reference habitats, we transplanted 30 rooted individuals each into habitat in which large varnished surface rocks were removed and into nearby undisturbed habitat. Within habitats, half the individuals were transplanted into open (no rocks) or rock (rocks surrounding transplants) microsites. In the first 15 months after planting, which had average precipitation, transplant survival did not differ between microsite types in either habitat but functional measures were influenced positively by nurse rocks. Nurse rocks sharply increased vegetative growth in 91.7% of transplants in undisturbed habitat and in flowering occurrence in 28.6% of transplants in disturbed habitat. Nurse rocks became even more important during extreme drought as the experiment progressed. By 27 months after planting, 2× (disturbed habitat) and 8× (undisturbed habitat) more transplants survived with nurse rocks compared to without. As a low-cost technique utilizing on-site material, nurse rocks show promise for enhancing revegetation success on disturbed desert sites, especially during drought.
护理石作为一种最小投入修复仙人掌的技术
沙漠中的许多植物招聘发生在成熟多年生植物树冠下的荫蔽微型站点。受干扰地区缺乏“保育植物”往往会阻碍生态恢复。考虑到直接恢复沙漠中活植物的不确定性和费用,我们探索了使用非生物结构——乳母岩——作为在美国索诺兰沙漠一个受干扰的地点重建仙人掌(海狸尾刺)的恢复选择。该地点的野生种群与大的表面岩石密切相关。为了检验岩石是否在受干扰和未受干扰的参考栖息地中起到了类似的保护作用,我们将30个有根的个体分别移植到去除了大的表面岩石的栖息地和附近未受干扰栖息地。在栖息地内,一半的个体被移植到开放的(没有岩石)或岩石(移植周围的岩石)微型站点。在平均降水量的种植后的前15个月,两个栖息地的微型站点类型之间的移植存活率没有差异,但功能指标受到乳母岩的积极影响。在未受干扰的栖息地中,91.7%的移植植物的营养生长和28.6%的受干扰栖息地移植植物的开花率急剧增加。随着实验的进行,在极端干旱期间,护士岩石变得更加重要。到种植后27个月,与没有乳母岩相比,有乳母岩的移植存活了2倍(受干扰的栖息地)和8倍(未受干扰的生境)。作为一种利用现场材料的低成本技术,护岩有望提高受干扰沙漠地区的植被重建成功率,尤其是在干旱期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Restoration
Ecological Restoration Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Ecological Restoration is a forum for people advancing the science and practice of restoration ecology. It features the technical and biological aspects of restoring landscapes, as well as collaborations between restorationists and the design professions, land-use policy, the role of education, and more. This quarterly publication includes peer-reviewed science articles, perspectives and notes, book reviews, abstracts of restoration ecology progress published elsewhere, and announcements of scientific and professional meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信