A diffractive and decolonising reading methodology for education research

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
R. Bellingham
{"title":"A diffractive and decolonising reading methodology for education research","authors":"R. Bellingham","doi":"10.1017/aee.2022.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract For white settler researchers aiming to contribute to the work of decolonising education, actively seeking ways to disturb and destabilise long-held onto-epistemological assumptions associated with colonial modernity is important. In this article I investigate how these disturbances might occur in a diffractive and decolonising reading methodology. I outline two prior diffractive reading experiences that drew on decolonial theory and Barad’s diffraction theory: A situated inquiry of the Great Barrier Reef as a pedagogical agent; and a reading of Australian teacher education policy through military imaginaries. In this article I read these prior diffractive reading experiences through one another, attending to further methodological patterns. I identify two connected methods of defamiliarisation that are generative for destabilising colonising ways of knowing, norms and thinking in education. These are: Bringing ostensibly different phenomena together in diffractive relations with one another; and reading difference in the spirit of companionship, that is, in an orientation to learning from difference rather than to master difference. I suggest that if education continues to rely on and wield the same modern critical tools that support colonial-capitalist systems it will be unable to recognise, address and reimagine the continued violence of these systems.","PeriodicalId":44842,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Education","volume":"38 1","pages":"375 - 387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Environmental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2022.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract For white settler researchers aiming to contribute to the work of decolonising education, actively seeking ways to disturb and destabilise long-held onto-epistemological assumptions associated with colonial modernity is important. In this article I investigate how these disturbances might occur in a diffractive and decolonising reading methodology. I outline two prior diffractive reading experiences that drew on decolonial theory and Barad’s diffraction theory: A situated inquiry of the Great Barrier Reef as a pedagogical agent; and a reading of Australian teacher education policy through military imaginaries. In this article I read these prior diffractive reading experiences through one another, attending to further methodological patterns. I identify two connected methods of defamiliarisation that are generative for destabilising colonising ways of knowing, norms and thinking in education. These are: Bringing ostensibly different phenomena together in diffractive relations with one another; and reading difference in the spirit of companionship, that is, in an orientation to learning from difference rather than to master difference. I suggest that if education continues to rely on and wield the same modern critical tools that support colonial-capitalist systems it will be unable to recognise, address and reimagine the continued violence of these systems.
教育研究的衍射和非殖民化阅读方法
对于旨在为非殖民化教育工作做出贡献的白人定居者研究人员来说,积极寻求干扰和破坏长期以来与殖民现代性相关的认识论假设的方法是很重要的。在本文中,我研究了这些干扰如何在衍射和非殖民化阅读方法中发生。我概述了两个先前的衍射阅读经历,它们借鉴了非殖民化理论和巴拉德的衍射理论:作为教学媒介的大堡礁的定位调查;以及通过军事想象解读澳大利亚教师教育政策。在本文中,我逐一阅读了这些先前的衍射阅读经验,并关注了进一步的方法模式。我确定了两种相互关联的陌生化方法,它们对教育中不稳定的殖民式认知、规范和思维方式产生了影响。它们是:把表面上不同的现象以衍射关系联系在一起;与阅读差异的精神为伴,也就是说,以一种从差异中学习而不是掌握差异的倾向。我认为,如果教育继续依赖和使用支持殖民资本主义制度的现代批判工具,它将无法认识、解决和重新想象这些制度的持续暴力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Environmental Education
Australian Journal of Environmental Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: An internationally refereed journal which publishes papers and reports on all aspects of environmental education. It presents information and argument which stimulates debate about educational strategies that enhance the kinds of awareness, understanding and actions which will promote environmental and social justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信