Implementation of pharmacist consultations as part of a multidisciplinary consultation program for patients with oral anticancer agent: A descriptive study

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
C. Streicher, Annick Daulange
{"title":"Implementation of pharmacist consultations as part of a multidisciplinary consultation program for patients with oral anticancer agent: A descriptive study","authors":"C. Streicher, Annick Daulange","doi":"10.1097/OP9.0000000000000003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In this study we describe the implementation in a hospital setting of pharmacist consultations, by oncology pharmacists, as part of a multidisciplinary consultation program (MCP) established for patients before they start a new oral anticancer treatment. Methods: Pharmacist consultations consisted of 3 steps in the MCP. (1) The first one was the preparation of the medication assessment with the realization of an accurate patient medication list. (2) The second step was the pharmacist consultation with the patient. The oncology pharmacist assessed the ability of the patient to self-manage their therapy at home and gave information about the new drug. To prevent potential drug, herbs, and food interactions, individual medication plans were also performed. (3) Finally, the oncology pharmacist completed and sent the multidisciplinary report to the community pharmacists with a satisfaction survey. Results: Ninety patients, enrolled in the MCP, received pharmacist consultations. Oncology pharmacists reported that 24% (n = 22) of the patients were not able to take their medicine by themselves and that information for the home caregiver was needed. The realization of the best possible medication history highlighted drug interactions in 36% (n = 32) of patients and required, for 4 patients, discontinuation of 1 drug of their regular medicines. With the information delivered by oncology pharmacists, 83% of the community pharmacists contacted were able to better advise the patient at the time of the oral anticancer agent dispensing. Conclusions: The implementation of the MCP with pharmacist consultations allowed us to better support patients who start new oral anticancer treatment and shows us how crucial the expertise of oncology pharmacists is. They contribute to limit drug-related problems especially by identifying drug, herbs, and food interactions but also by identifying the patients unable to self-manage their therapy at home. The collaboration established with the community pharmacists allowed us to improve patient management by sharing information and knowledge.","PeriodicalId":39134,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000003","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction: In this study we describe the implementation in a hospital setting of pharmacist consultations, by oncology pharmacists, as part of a multidisciplinary consultation program (MCP) established for patients before they start a new oral anticancer treatment. Methods: Pharmacist consultations consisted of 3 steps in the MCP. (1) The first one was the preparation of the medication assessment with the realization of an accurate patient medication list. (2) The second step was the pharmacist consultation with the patient. The oncology pharmacist assessed the ability of the patient to self-manage their therapy at home and gave information about the new drug. To prevent potential drug, herbs, and food interactions, individual medication plans were also performed. (3) Finally, the oncology pharmacist completed and sent the multidisciplinary report to the community pharmacists with a satisfaction survey. Results: Ninety patients, enrolled in the MCP, received pharmacist consultations. Oncology pharmacists reported that 24% (n = 22) of the patients were not able to take their medicine by themselves and that information for the home caregiver was needed. The realization of the best possible medication history highlighted drug interactions in 36% (n = 32) of patients and required, for 4 patients, discontinuation of 1 drug of their regular medicines. With the information delivered by oncology pharmacists, 83% of the community pharmacists contacted were able to better advise the patient at the time of the oral anticancer agent dispensing. Conclusions: The implementation of the MCP with pharmacist consultations allowed us to better support patients who start new oral anticancer treatment and shows us how crucial the expertise of oncology pharmacists is. They contribute to limit drug-related problems especially by identifying drug, herbs, and food interactions but also by identifying the patients unable to self-manage their therapy at home. The collaboration established with the community pharmacists allowed us to improve patient management by sharing information and knowledge.
实施药剂师咨询作为口服抗癌药物患者多学科咨询计划的一部分:一项描述性研究
简介:在这项研究中,我们描述了在医院设置药剂师咨询的实施,由肿瘤药剂师,作为多学科咨询计划(MCP)的一部分,为患者建立了一个新的口服抗癌治疗之前。方法:药师会诊分为MCP的三个步骤。(1)首先是制定用药评估,实现准确的患者用药清单。(2)第二步是药师与患者的咨询。肿瘤药剂师评估了病人在家自我管理治疗的能力,并提供了有关新药的信息。为了防止潜在的药物、草药和食物相互作用,还执行了个人用药计划。(3)最后,肿瘤科药师完成多学科报告并向社区药师发送满意度调查。结果:90例纳入MCP的患者接受了药师咨询。肿瘤药剂师报告说,24% (n = 22)的患者不能自己服药,需要家庭护理人员的信息。36% (n = 32)患者的最佳用药史强调了药物相互作用,4例患者需要停药常规药物中的1种药物。通过肿瘤药剂师提供的信息,83%的社区药剂师能够在口服抗癌药物配药时更好地建议患者。结论:MCP与药剂师咨询的实施使我们能够更好地支持开始新的口服抗癌治疗的患者,并表明肿瘤药剂师的专业知识是多么重要。它们有助于限制与药物有关的问题,特别是通过识别药物、草药和食物的相互作用,但也通过识别无法在家中自我管理治疗的患者。与社区药剂师建立的合作使我们能够通过共享信息和知识来改善患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信