Impact of a Digital Strategy Team in an Academic Stroke Journal: 1 Year in Review

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
J. Siegler, Catherine Albin, E. Jones, Anamarie Schluntz, Jonathan Schultz, A. Jadhav
{"title":"Impact of a Digital Strategy Team in an Academic Stroke Journal: 1 Year in Review","authors":"J. Siegler, Catherine Albin, E. Jones, Anamarie Schluntz, Jonathan Schultz, A. Jadhav","doi":"10.1161/svin.123.000872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The social media platform Twitter has increasingly been leveraged to disseminate clinical and academic content, including scientific research. Launched in November 2021 as an exclusively online open access journal, the\n Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\n journal was not indexed on PubMed for its first year of publication. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the journal's Twitter presence by tracking social media posts and article metrics over the first year since the journal's inception.\n \n \n \n \n Measures of Twitter influence from the @SVINJournal account were associated with the academic impact of articles published in the associated journal during the first 13 months of the journal's publication record. Descriptive statistics and the Pearson correlation coefficient were used to quantify measures of association, with the primary outcome being unique article requests (downloads).\n \n \n \n \n There were 174 unique articles published during the study period, with 367 unique tweets. Articles referenced in tweets from @SVINJournal had nearly twice as many requests as articles without tweets (median 967 [interquartile range, 683–1357] versus 497 [interquartile range, 331–711];\n P\n <0.01), with a mild correlation between number of tweets and article requests when @SVINJournal cited the article in tweets (\n r\n =0.20;\n P\n =0.009). There was a fair correlation between article request counts and any Twitter mentions (\n r\n =0.41;\n P\n <0.001), and a poor correlation between article requests and altmetric score (\n r\n =0.15;\n P\n =0.04). There was a small correlation between the number of citations and number of tweets from @SVINJournal (\n r\n =0.21;\n P\n =0.006).\n \n \n \n \n There was a statistically significant, but small, association between tweets and article requests as well as citations. Highly tweeted articles had a higher number of citations. In the absence of PubMed indexing and print distribution, social media platforms can have an impact in promoting peer‐reviewed content and may increase content access and citations.\n","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.000872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The social media platform Twitter has increasingly been leveraged to disseminate clinical and academic content, including scientific research. Launched in November 2021 as an exclusively online open access journal, the Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology journal was not indexed on PubMed for its first year of publication. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the journal's Twitter presence by tracking social media posts and article metrics over the first year since the journal's inception. Measures of Twitter influence from the @SVINJournal account were associated with the academic impact of articles published in the associated journal during the first 13 months of the journal's publication record. Descriptive statistics and the Pearson correlation coefficient were used to quantify measures of association, with the primary outcome being unique article requests (downloads). There were 174 unique articles published during the study period, with 367 unique tweets. Articles referenced in tweets from @SVINJournal had nearly twice as many requests as articles without tweets (median 967 [interquartile range, 683–1357] versus 497 [interquartile range, 331–711]; P <0.01), with a mild correlation between number of tweets and article requests when @SVINJournal cited the article in tweets ( r =0.20; P =0.009). There was a fair correlation between article request counts and any Twitter mentions ( r =0.41; P <0.001), and a poor correlation between article requests and altmetric score ( r =0.15; P =0.04). There was a small correlation between the number of citations and number of tweets from @SVINJournal ( r =0.21; P =0.006). There was a statistically significant, but small, association between tweets and article requests as well as citations. Highly tweeted articles had a higher number of citations. In the absence of PubMed indexing and print distribution, social media platforms can have an impact in promoting peer‐reviewed content and may increase content access and citations.
数字战略团队对学术中风期刊的影响:1年回顾
社交媒体平台推特越来越多地被用来传播临床和学术内容,包括科学研究。《中风:血管与介入神经病学》杂志于2021年11月作为一本独家在线开放获取期刊推出,出版第一年没有在PubMed上编入索引。我们的目标是通过跟踪该杂志创办以来第一年的社交媒体帖子和文章指标来评估该杂志在推特上的影响力。@SVINJournal账户对推特影响力的衡量与该杂志出版记录前13个月在相关期刊上发表的文章的学术影响有关。描述性统计和Pearson相关系数用于量化关联测量,主要结果是独特的文章请求(下载)。在研究期间发表了174篇独特的文章,367条独特的推文。@SVINJournal推文中引用的文章的请求量几乎是没有推文的文章的两倍(中位数为967[四分位间距,683-1357],而不是497[四分位数间距,331-711];P<0.01),当@SVINJournal在推特中引用该文章时,推特数量与文章请求之间存在轻度相关性(r=0.20;P=0.009)。文章请求数量与任何推特提及之间存在相当的相关性(r=0.41;P<0.001),文章请求与altmetric评分之间的相关性较差(r=0.15;P=0.04)。@SVINJournal的引用次数与推文次数之间的相关性较小(r=0.21;P=0.006)。推文与文章请求以及引用之间存在统计学上显著但较小的关联。高度推特化的文章被引用的次数更高。在没有PubMed索引和印刷品分发的情况下,社交媒体平台可以在推广同行评审内容方面产生影响,并可能增加内容访问和引用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信