The role of IT Governance in digital operating models

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS

Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research Pub Date : 2018-11-19 DOI:10.15549/JEECAR.V5I2.210

Christian Hitz, Karlheinz Schwer

{"title":"The role of IT Governance in digital operating models","authors":"Christian Hitz, Karlheinz Schwer","doi":"10.15549/JEECAR.V5I2.210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many researches have dedicated their work in IT Governance and numerous methods, techniques and tools for making decisions to align IT to a business strategy were proposed in the last decade. In the meantime new digital business models developed rapidly and aligning business with IT have become more difficult ever. Governance frameworks are widely used to reduce complexity in the decision making process and organisations tend to use several topic related governance frameworks beside IT Governance. Different governance frameworks are related, dependent and interact under each other and since they all have their own method of measurement and evaluation, the interaction suffers of a lack of data consistency or they do not take all dimensions of decision making into account. Furthermore the lack of consistency is caused by definition of governance frameworks itself and lead to concurring goals among governing bodies. This paper proposes a design goal for a method of measurement by (1) critically review the existing state of art of measurement and evaluation concepts of governance frameworks by following a comprehensive review of the normative literature dealing with the measurement aspects of IT Governance and (2) analysing a dataset (n=51) of a preliminary study done in spring 2017 with Swiss companies.","PeriodicalId":37422,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15549/JEECAR.V5I2.210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Many researches have dedicated their work in IT Governance and numerous methods, techniques and tools for making decisions to align IT to a business strategy were proposed in the last decade. In the meantime new digital business models developed rapidly and aligning business with IT have become more difficult ever. Governance frameworks are widely used to reduce complexity in the decision making process and organisations tend to use several topic related governance frameworks beside IT Governance. Different governance frameworks are related, dependent and interact under each other and since they all have their own method of measurement and evaluation, the interaction suffers of a lack of data consistency or they do not take all dimensions of decision making into account. Furthermore the lack of consistency is caused by definition of governance frameworks itself and lead to concurring goals among governing bodies. This paper proposes a design goal for a method of measurement by (1) critically review the existing state of art of measurement and evaluation concepts of governance frameworks by following a comprehensive review of the normative literature dealing with the measurement aspects of IT Governance and (2) analysing a dataset (n=51) of a preliminary study done in spring 2017 with Swiss companies.

查看原文本刊更多论文

IT治理在数字运营模式中的作用

许多研究人员致力于IT治理，并且在过去十年中提出了许多方法、技术和工具来制定决策，使IT与业务策略保持一致。与此同时，新的数字业务模式迅速发展，使业务与IT相结合变得更加困难。治理框架被广泛用于降低决策过程的复杂性，除了IT治理之外，组织还倾向于使用几个与主题相关的治理框架。不同的治理框架是相互关联、依赖和相互作用的，由于它们都有自己的度量和评估方法，因此这种相互作用缺乏数据一致性，或者它们没有考虑到决策的所有维度。此外，缺乏一致性是由治理框架本身的定义引起的，并导致治理机构之间的目标一致。本文提出了一种测量方法的设计目标:(1)通过全面审查涉及IT治理测量方面的规范性文献，批判性地审查治理框架的测量和评估概念的现有技术状况;(2)分析2017年春季与瑞士公司进行的初步研究的数据集(n=51)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

43.80%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR) is a multi-disciplinary journal related to the Eurasia regional economics, finance, management, marketing, international affairs, and other business-related disciplines. By Eastern Europe and Central Asia, the IEECA refers to Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia, and five post-Soviet Central Asian states: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics. Any paper submitted to the journal must be original, previously unpublished, and currently not under consideration for publication elsewhere. All articles in the printed version of the journal are peer-reviewed. The review process is a double-blind process. Neither the authors nor the reviewers know who wrote or reviewed the article. Per standard practice, only the Editor assigned to handle a paper knows the identity of the authors and the reviewers.