Motivations, procedures and stated values for municipal flood plans: experiences from Central Europe

IF 1.6 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL

Water International Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI:10.1080/02508060.2023.2214876

Monika Krpešová, P. Raška

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Municipal flood plans represent the lowest administrative planning instrument for flood risk management. Their value for local representatives in coping with floods remains unclear, however. We present a survey of municipal flood plans among 356 municipal representatives in Czechia. Our results indicate that legal and financial incentives are key motivations for adopting the plans; there is a rather weak collaborative effort from private companies when preparing the plans; and the trust in value of the plans is rather low. This calls for stronger integration of local and national expectations regarding flood planning instruments and for new frameworks of their assessment.

查看原文本刊更多论文

城市防洪计划的动机、程序和既定价值：中欧的经验

摘要：城市洪水规划是洪水风险管理的最低行政规划工具。然而，它们对当地代表应对洪水的价值尚不清楚。我们对捷克356名市政代表的市政洪水计划进行了调查。我们的研究结果表明，法律和财政激励是采用这些计划的主要动机；在制定计划时，私营公司的合作力度相当弱；对这些计划价值的信任度也相当低。这就要求加强地方和国家对洪水规划工具的期望，并建立新的评估框架。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Water International 工程技术-工程：土木

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

7.70%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Water International is the official journal of the International Water Resources Association (IWRA), founded in 1972 to serve as an international gateway to the people, ideas and networks that are critical to the sustainable management of water resources around the world. Water International''s articles, state-of-the-art reviews, technical notes and other matter are policy-relevant and aimed at communicating in-depth knowledge to a multidisciplinary and international community. Water International publishes both individual contributions and thematic special issues and sections on cutting edge issues. All individual manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal and peer review by the Deputy Editor in Chief and the Associate Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by at least one independent, anonymous expert referee. All external peer review is double blind. Thematic issues and sections are handled under comparable procedures by guest editors under the oversight of the Editor in Chief.