{"title":"Survival and Success of Mini Dental Implants Supporting Complete Removable Over-Dentures: A Literature Review","authors":"S. Abela, Milisha Chotai, S. Rahma","doi":"10.58624/svoade.2023.04.0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and Objectives: To review and report on the literature covering the cumulative survival and success of Mini Dental Implants (MDIs) supporting complete removable over-dentures. Materials and Methods: An electronic keyword search was carried out using PubMed for Medline (National Library of Medicine, Washington, DC), Google-Scholar, and the Web of Science® interface by M.C. and S.R. The standard and network approaches were utilised according to O’Connor (1992). The initial search was carried out from the 1st of December 2015 to the 31st of March 2016, followed by a second and final search finalised in November 2020. The above -mentioned data bases were searched using combinations of the following key words: Mini dental implant*, Mini-dental implant*, “Narrow diameter dental implant*”, “small diameter dental implant*”. Boolean operators (‘Or’ and ‘AND’) were used to expand, exclude and join keywords. Results: 20 full text articles were analysed. The cumulative MDI survival rate ranged from 66-100% at 1-8.7 years. Success rates ranged from 78-100% Conclusions: MDI survival rates were found to be lower than those of regular sized implants supporting removable complete over-dentures however success rates of MDIs are high in the short term and offer a very good alternative to regular sized implants. Failures and complications were more prevalent in the maxilla than in the mandible","PeriodicalId":93501,"journal":{"name":"SVOA Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVOA Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoade.2023.04.0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims and Objectives: To review and report on the literature covering the cumulative survival and success of Mini Dental Implants (MDIs) supporting complete removable over-dentures. Materials and Methods: An electronic keyword search was carried out using PubMed for Medline (National Library of Medicine, Washington, DC), Google-Scholar, and the Web of Science® interface by M.C. and S.R. The standard and network approaches were utilised according to O’Connor (1992). The initial search was carried out from the 1st of December 2015 to the 31st of March 2016, followed by a second and final search finalised in November 2020. The above -mentioned data bases were searched using combinations of the following key words: Mini dental implant*, Mini-dental implant*, “Narrow diameter dental implant*”, “small diameter dental implant*”. Boolean operators (‘Or’ and ‘AND’) were used to expand, exclude and join keywords. Results: 20 full text articles were analysed. The cumulative MDI survival rate ranged from 66-100% at 1-8.7 years. Success rates ranged from 78-100% Conclusions: MDI survival rates were found to be lower than those of regular sized implants supporting removable complete over-dentures however success rates of MDIs are high in the short term and offer a very good alternative to regular sized implants. Failures and complications were more prevalent in the maxilla than in the mandible
目的和目的:回顾和报道有关迷你种植体(mdi)支持全口可摘覆盖义齿的累积生存和成功的文献。材料和方法:使用PubMed for Medline(国家医学图书馆,华盛顿特区)、Google-Scholar和M.C.和S.R.的Web of Science®界面进行电子关键字搜索。根据O’connor(1992)的说法,使用了标准和网络方法。初步搜索于2015年12月1日至2016年3月31日进行,随后于2020年11月完成了第二次也是最后一次搜索。通过以下关键词组合检索上述数据库:Mini dental implant*、Mini-dental implant*、“Narrow diameter dental implant*”、“small diameter dental implant*”。布尔运算符(' Or '和' and ')用于展开、排除和连接关键字。结果:分析了20篇全文文章。1-8.7年的MDI累计生存率为66% -100%。结论:MDI的成活率低于常规尺寸种植体支持可移动全覆盖义齿,但短期内MDI的成功率很高,是常规尺寸种植体的一个很好的选择。失败和并发症在上颌骨比下颌骨更普遍