Minör göğüs travmasında radyografinin kaburga kırıklarını tanımada yeterliliği: Sonografi ve radyografinin etkinlik kıyaslaması

Emre Yurdakul, Servet Kahveci̇
{"title":"Minör göğüs travmasında radyografinin kaburga kırıklarını tanımada yeterliliği: Sonografi ve radyografinin etkinlik kıyaslaması","authors":"Emre Yurdakul, Servet Kahveci̇","doi":"10.22391/fppc.1033620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The most common injury resulting from blunt chest trauma is a rib fracture (25%) which is usually visible on radiographs. However, radiographs sometimes cannot show fractures, especially those in cartilage, unless they're densely calcified. The present study aimed to investigate the role of ultrasonography (US) in detecting rib fractures with minor blunt chest trauma and comparing its success with posteroanterior (PA) chest radiography.Methods: Patients with minor blunt chest trauma who had previously undergone US and radiography to assess suspected rib fractures, between June 2017– March 2019, were included. Radiography was obtained in the PA projection. US was performed by a radiologist who identified fractures by the disruption of the anterior margin of the rib on the US. The incidence and location of the fractures detected by US and radiography were then compared.Results: Totally 126 patients were included in the study. Ninety-eight patients (78%) were admitted to the hospital for the first time, and 28 patients (22%) for the second time (they previously admitted to the other hospitals and were evaluated as ‘normal’ by radiography). A total of 108 fractures ( in 79 patients (63%) ) were detected based on radiography and US examination, while 47 patients (37%) had no diagnostic evidence of fracture. All fractures were correctly detected by ultrasonography (100%), whereas radiography revealed 16 fractures (14.81%). A statistically significant difference in diagnostic capability was found between patients diagnosed by radiography and US (p=0.001).Conclusion: Ultrasonographic imaging is significantly superior to radiography in terms of accuracy in diagnosing rib fractures. Ultrasound was found to be significantly superior to radiography regardless of trauma site, localization, and location. Even though some rib areas are inaccessible on ultrasonographic evaluation, rapid evaluation of the most affected areas is most effective with ultrasonography when it comes to minor energy chest trauma. For this reason, the US increases the accuracy of diagnosis in minor chest traumas and rib fractures and decreases the repetitive referral of patients to health institutions by reducing the missed diagnosis.Keywords: Rib fractures, thoracic injuries, trauma, ultrasonography, radiography","PeriodicalId":31541,"journal":{"name":"Family Practice and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Practice and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22391/fppc.1033620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The most common injury resulting from blunt chest trauma is a rib fracture (25%) which is usually visible on radiographs. However, radiographs sometimes cannot show fractures, especially those in cartilage, unless they're densely calcified. The present study aimed to investigate the role of ultrasonography (US) in detecting rib fractures with minor blunt chest trauma and comparing its success with posteroanterior (PA) chest radiography.Methods: Patients with minor blunt chest trauma who had previously undergone US and radiography to assess suspected rib fractures, between June 2017– March 2019, were included. Radiography was obtained in the PA projection. US was performed by a radiologist who identified fractures by the disruption of the anterior margin of the rib on the US. The incidence and location of the fractures detected by US and radiography were then compared.Results: Totally 126 patients were included in the study. Ninety-eight patients (78%) were admitted to the hospital for the first time, and 28 patients (22%) for the second time (they previously admitted to the other hospitals and were evaluated as ‘normal’ by radiography). A total of 108 fractures ( in 79 patients (63%) ) were detected based on radiography and US examination, while 47 patients (37%) had no diagnostic evidence of fracture. All fractures were correctly detected by ultrasonography (100%), whereas radiography revealed 16 fractures (14.81%). A statistically significant difference in diagnostic capability was found between patients diagnosed by radiography and US (p=0.001).Conclusion: Ultrasonographic imaging is significantly superior to radiography in terms of accuracy in diagnosing rib fractures. Ultrasound was found to be significantly superior to radiography regardless of trauma site, localization, and location. Even though some rib areas are inaccessible on ultrasonographic evaluation, rapid evaluation of the most affected areas is most effective with ultrasonography when it comes to minor energy chest trauma. For this reason, the US increases the accuracy of diagnosis in minor chest traumas and rib fractures and decreases the repetitive referral of patients to health institutions by reducing the missed diagnosis.Keywords: Rib fractures, thoracic injuries, trauma, ultrasonography, radiography
足以检测腹部骨折的x线平片在轻微胸部创伤中的应用:一项概要和x线平片效率比较
简介:钝性胸部外伤最常见的损伤是肋骨骨折(25%),通常在x线片上可见。然而,x光片有时无法显示骨折,特别是软骨骨折,除非它们密集钙化。本研究旨在探讨超声(US)在检测轻度钝性胸部创伤的肋骨骨折中的作用,并将其与后路胸片(PA)的成功率进行比较。方法:纳入2017年6月至2019年3月期间接受过US和x线检查以评估疑似肋骨骨折的轻微钝性胸部创伤患者。在PA投影中获得x线片。US是由一位放射科医生进行的,他通过US上肋骨前缘的破坏确定了骨折。然后比较超声和x线摄影检测到的骨折发生率和位置。结果:共纳入126例患者。98名患者(78%)为首次入院,28名患者(22%)为第二次入院(他们之前曾在其他医院入院,并通过x线摄影评估为“正常”)。通过x线摄影和超声检查共发现108例骨折(79例患者(63%)),而47例患者(37%)没有骨折的诊断证据。所有骨折超声检出率均为100%,而x线片检出率为16例(14.81%)。通过x线摄影和超声诊断的患者在诊断能力上有统计学意义的差异(p=0.001)。结论:超声对肋骨骨折的诊断准确性明显优于x线摄影。无论创伤部位、定位和位置如何,超声都明显优于x线摄影。尽管一些肋骨区域在超声评估中无法到达,但当涉及到轻微的胸部能量损伤时,超声快速评估受影响最大的区域是最有效的。因此,美国提高了轻微胸部创伤和肋骨骨折的诊断准确性,通过减少漏诊,减少了患者反复转诊到卫生机构的次数。关键词:肋骨骨折,胸椎损伤,创伤,超声,影像学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信