Component deformation-based collapse evaluation of RC frameunder different collapse criteria

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Huang Difang, Han Xiaolei, Qiao Shengfang, Ji Jing, Jidong Cui
{"title":"Component deformation-based collapse evaluation of RC frameunder different collapse criteria","authors":"Huang Difang, Han Xiaolei, Qiao Shengfang, Ji Jing, Jidong Cui","doi":"10.12989/EAS.2021.21.2.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developments in performance-based earthquake engineering have emphasized the importance of evaluation of structural collapse resistance. Several collapse criteria were proposed to define structural collapse in various perspective. In this paper, collapse resistant capacity of ductile reinforced concrete (RC) frame was evaluated using different collapse criteria. Since most of the criteria focus on overall structural response, a component deformation-based method was adopted to describe the damage in component level. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) of a 6-story ductile RC frame conforms to current codes was conducted in OpenSEES. The collapse resistant capacity under different collapse criteria was compared. Moreover, relationship between overall structural response and the distribution of damaged components were discussed through the component deformation-based method. It was indicated that the story of maximum inter-story drift ratio is neither consistent with the one which is most seriously damaged nor with the story of maximum residual inter-story drift ratio. Furthermore, the component deformation-based method can depict structural damaged state and formation of collapse mechanism more reasonably. The analysis result evidences that structure conforms to current code have the good ductility and hardly reaches physical collapse under rare earthquake, however, the structure is more likely to be demolished due to unacceptable residual deformation.","PeriodicalId":49080,"journal":{"name":"Earthquakes and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquakes and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12989/EAS.2021.21.2.113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Developments in performance-based earthquake engineering have emphasized the importance of evaluation of structural collapse resistance. Several collapse criteria were proposed to define structural collapse in various perspective. In this paper, collapse resistant capacity of ductile reinforced concrete (RC) frame was evaluated using different collapse criteria. Since most of the criteria focus on overall structural response, a component deformation-based method was adopted to describe the damage in component level. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) of a 6-story ductile RC frame conforms to current codes was conducted in OpenSEES. The collapse resistant capacity under different collapse criteria was compared. Moreover, relationship between overall structural response and the distribution of damaged components were discussed through the component deformation-based method. It was indicated that the story of maximum inter-story drift ratio is neither consistent with the one which is most seriously damaged nor with the story of maximum residual inter-story drift ratio. Furthermore, the component deformation-based method can depict structural damaged state and formation of collapse mechanism more reasonably. The analysis result evidences that structure conforms to current code have the good ductility and hardly reaches physical collapse under rare earthquake, however, the structure is more likely to be demolished due to unacceptable residual deformation.
基于构件变形的RC框架在不同倒塌准则下的倒塌评价
基于性能的地震工程的发展强调了结构抗倒塌评估的重要性。提出了几种倒塌准则,从不同的角度来定义结构的倒塌。本文采用不同的倒塌准则对延性钢筋混凝土框架的抗倒塌能力进行了评价。由于大多数准则关注的是整体结构响应,因此采用基于构件变形的方法来描述构件级别的损伤。在OpenSEES中对符合现行规范的6层延性钢筋混凝土框架进行了增量动力分析(IDA)。比较了不同倒塌准则下的抗倒塌能力。通过基于构件变形的方法,讨论了结构整体响应与损伤构件分布之间的关系。结果表明,最大层间位移比的层数与受损最严重层间位移比的层数不一致,也与最大剩余层间位移比的层数不一致。此外,基于构件变形的方法可以更合理地描述结构的破坏状态和破坏机制的形成。分析结果表明,符合现行规范的结构具有良好的延性,在罕见的地震作用下几乎不会发生物理倒塌,但由于残余变形不可接受,结构更容易被拆除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquakes and Structures
Earthquakes and Structures ENGINEERING, CIVIL-ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Earthquakes and Structures, An International Journal, focuses on the effects of earthquakes on civil engineering structures. The journal will serve as a powerful repository of technical information and will provide a highimpact publication platform for the global community of researchers in the traditional, as well as emerging, subdisciplines of the broader earthquake engineering field. Specifically, some of the major topics covered by the Journal include: .. characterization of strong ground motions, .. quantification of earthquake demand and structural capacity, .. design of earthquake resistant structures and foundations, .. experimental and computational methods, .. seismic regulations and building codes, .. seismic hazard assessment, .. seismic risk mitigation, .. site effects and soil-structure interaction, .. assessment, repair and strengthening of existing structures, including historic structures and monuments, and .. emerging technologies including passive control technologies, structural monitoring systems, and cyberinfrastructure tools for seismic data management, experimental applications, early warning and response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信