{"title":"Diglossia and change from below in Eastern Cham","authors":"K. Baclawski","doi":"10.1075/APLV.17003.BAC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Diglossia canonically refers to language situations with unequal attitudes towards a formal ‘H’ variety, connected to writing, and\n a colloquial ‘L’ variety, connected to everyday speech. This paper claims that variation that arises as a marker of diglossia can\n become dissociated from it and persist in the L variety, if it is sufficiently orthogonal to the writing system. With a\n sociolinguistic survey (n = 30), this paper examines five variables that were markers of quasi-diglossia in\n Eastern Cham in previous decades. Three of the variables continue to be stereotypes or shibboleths of diglossia, while the other\n two no longer exhibit any correlation with diglossia: the spirantization of r and the labial coarticulation of\n ŋ. The latter were changes from below that decoupled from diglossia, because they were sufficiently opaque to\n Cham script.","PeriodicalId":29731,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Language Variation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Language Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/APLV.17003.BAC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Diglossia canonically refers to language situations with unequal attitudes towards a formal ‘H’ variety, connected to writing, and
a colloquial ‘L’ variety, connected to everyday speech. This paper claims that variation that arises as a marker of diglossia can
become dissociated from it and persist in the L variety, if it is sufficiently orthogonal to the writing system. With a
sociolinguistic survey (n = 30), this paper examines five variables that were markers of quasi-diglossia in
Eastern Cham in previous decades. Three of the variables continue to be stereotypes or shibboleths of diglossia, while the other
two no longer exhibit any correlation with diglossia: the spirantization of r and the labial coarticulation of
ŋ. The latter were changes from below that decoupled from diglossia, because they were sufficiently opaque to
Cham script.