Coefficients of static and dynamic friction of ceramic floor tiles: proposal of new method of surface roughness determination

Q3 Engineering
Aline Demarch, Elcio Angioletto, A. W. Vieira, Andreza Dal Molin, O. Montedo, E. Angioletto
{"title":"Coefficients of static and dynamic friction of ceramic floor tiles: proposal of new method of surface roughness determination","authors":"Aline Demarch, Elcio Angioletto, A. W. Vieira, Andreza Dal Molin, O. Montedo, E. Angioletto","doi":"10.1051/IJMQE/2019002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the most important properties of ceramic floor tiles, the static and dynamic coefficients of friction assume an important role. The literature and current standards regarding ceramic floor tiles suggest different methods for determining the values of the coefficients of static and dynamic friction; however, all methods present limitations of implementation, and it is common for them to produce different values and hence specifications for different applications. In the present study, tests were conducted on the products with different topcoats and roughness to determine the coefficient of friction using the standards NBR 13818, ANSI A137.1, DIN 51130, and UNE-ENV 12633 and our proposed methodology. These values were compared with the roughness measurements obtained by mechanical contact profilometry. Additionally, empirical human evaluation of the roughness was performed. The trials indicated very different results on different experimental equipment for the same type of surface. The roughness test yielded parameters that correlate well with the empirical evaluation. The study shows the need for searching the uniformity of standards because each methodology produces different (even uncorrelated) results.","PeriodicalId":38371,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1051/IJMQE/2019002","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/IJMQE/2019002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Among the most important properties of ceramic floor tiles, the static and dynamic coefficients of friction assume an important role. The literature and current standards regarding ceramic floor tiles suggest different methods for determining the values of the coefficients of static and dynamic friction; however, all methods present limitations of implementation, and it is common for them to produce different values and hence specifications for different applications. In the present study, tests were conducted on the products with different topcoats and roughness to determine the coefficient of friction using the standards NBR 13818, ANSI A137.1, DIN 51130, and UNE-ENV 12633 and our proposed methodology. These values were compared with the roughness measurements obtained by mechanical contact profilometry. Additionally, empirical human evaluation of the roughness was performed. The trials indicated very different results on different experimental equipment for the same type of surface. The roughness test yielded parameters that correlate well with the empirical evaluation. The study shows the need for searching the uniformity of standards because each methodology produces different (even uncorrelated) results.
陶瓷地砖静、动摩擦系数:表面粗糙度测定新方法的提出
在陶瓷地砖最重要的性能中,静、动摩擦系数起着重要的作用。关于陶瓷地砖的文献和现行标准提出了不同的方法来确定静摩擦系数和动摩擦系数的值;然而,所有的方法都存在实现上的限制,并且它们通常会产生不同的值,因此会为不同的应用程序产生不同的规范。在本研究中,使用NBR 13818、ANSI A137.1、DIN 51130和UNE-ENV 12633标准和我们提出的方法,对具有不同表面涂层和粗糙度的产品进行了测试,以确定摩擦系数。将这些值与机械接触轮廓法获得的粗糙度测量值进行比较。此外,对粗糙度进行了经验人的评估。同一类型表面在不同的实验设备上的试验结果差异很大。粗糙度测试得出的参数与经验评价有很好的相关性。这项研究表明,需要寻找标准的一致性,因为每种方法产生不同(甚至不相关)的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering
International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信