Pavlína Hlavatá , Tomáš Kašpárek , Pavla Linhartová , Hana Ošlejšková , Martin Bareš
{"title":"Autism, impulsivity and inhibition a review of the literature","authors":"Pavlína Hlavatá , Tomáš Kašpárek , Pavla Linhartová , Hana Ošlejšková , Martin Bareš","doi":"10.1016/j.baga.2018.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patients with autism have difficulties with social interaction and communication and often exhibit repetitive and stereotyped behaviours. Many patients also exhibit impulsive forms of behaviour with negative impact on their quality of life. Although there have been many studies assessing behavioural inhibition in order to find the underlying mechanism of these disruptive forms of behaviour, the existence of inhibitory deficits in autism is still a subject of discussion. Discrepancies in results are due to the heterogeneity of tasks designs and research samples. Little is known about inhibition of socially relevant stimuli in autism because prior studies were mostly focused on inhibition in non-social context. Research of inhibitory control in social-relevant context is important, because patients with autism have problems mainly in social situations. In this review we will focus on studies of response inhibition, interference control and their neural correlates in patients with autism and discuss the possible sources of inconsistencies in the results. We include studies of behavioural inhibition in autism which were written in English and published between 1990 and 2017. Literature was searched by PubMed and Web of Science.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":89327,"journal":{"name":"Basal ganglia","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 44-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.baga.2018.10.002","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basal ganglia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210533618300224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
Patients with autism have difficulties with social interaction and communication and often exhibit repetitive and stereotyped behaviours. Many patients also exhibit impulsive forms of behaviour with negative impact on their quality of life. Although there have been many studies assessing behavioural inhibition in order to find the underlying mechanism of these disruptive forms of behaviour, the existence of inhibitory deficits in autism is still a subject of discussion. Discrepancies in results are due to the heterogeneity of tasks designs and research samples. Little is known about inhibition of socially relevant stimuli in autism because prior studies were mostly focused on inhibition in non-social context. Research of inhibitory control in social-relevant context is important, because patients with autism have problems mainly in social situations. In this review we will focus on studies of response inhibition, interference control and their neural correlates in patients with autism and discuss the possible sources of inconsistencies in the results. We include studies of behavioural inhibition in autism which were written in English and published between 1990 and 2017. Literature was searched by PubMed and Web of Science.
自闭症患者在社会交往和沟通方面有困难,经常表现出重复和刻板的行为。许多患者还表现出冲动的行为形式,对他们的生活质量产生负面影响。虽然已经有许多研究评估行为抑制,以找到这些破坏性行为形式的潜在机制,但自闭症中是否存在抑制缺陷仍然是一个讨论的主题。结果的差异是由于任务设计和研究样本的异质性。由于以往的研究主要集中在非社会环境下的抑制,因此对自闭症中社会相关刺激的抑制知之甚少。由于自闭症患者主要在社交情境中出现问题,因此研究社交相关情境中的抑制控制具有重要意义。在本文中,我们将重点介绍自闭症患者的反应抑制、干扰控制及其神经相关研究,并讨论结果不一致的可能来源。我们纳入了1990年至2017年期间用英语撰写并发表的自闭症行为抑制研究。文献通过PubMed和Web of Science进行检索。