Characteristics of intangible assets as object of accounting and specificities determination of it’s valuation

L. Gutsalenko, A. Beldiy
{"title":"Characteristics of intangible assets as object of accounting and specificities determination of it’s valuation","authors":"L. Gutsalenko, A. Beldiy","doi":"10.31548/bioeconomy2020.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The arƟcle discusses the accounƟng treatment for intangible assets. The authors note that intangible assets are the result of economic and technological development. On this basis, the classificaƟon of economic eras according to the relaƟonship between the use of tangible and intangible assets has been considered. The arƟcle also highlights the main criteria for intangible assets, namely legal and economic. The authors note that intangible assets are a group of balance sheets, in which the intellectual resources of the new economy could be reflected. It is noted that UNAS 8 “Intangible Assets” does not contain a certain part of the secƟons that are reflected in IAS 38 “Intangible Assets”, in parƟcular, separate acquisiƟons of an asset and acquisiƟons as part of the business associaƟon, acquisiƟons through government grants, etc. AccounƟng systems and items relaƟng to intangible assets are considered. Intangible assets, and especially intellectual capital, are considered to be an important source of capital deepening in European countries, albeit with significant differences among countries. It is noted that one of the biggest challenges in accounƟng for intangible assets is their valuaƟon and, according to certain requirements of the legislaƟon, the enƟty may revalue at fair value at the balance sheet date but if there is no acƟve market, the revaluaƟon may be carried out on the basis of an expert assessment of the subject of the evaluaƟon acƟvity. The authors maintain that the presƟge or importance of intangible objects can be assessed by expert judgment, as many factors constrain the implementaƟon of the excepƟonal features or properƟes specific to these objects. The authors discussed various methods for intangible asset valuaƟon and the prioriƟes for applying expert valuaƟon approaches to intangible assets and intellectual property objects in foreign pracƟce. The arƟcle also deals with staƟsƟcal data on the value of intangible assets in the balance sheets of Ukrainian enterprises.","PeriodicalId":33687,"journal":{"name":"Bioekonomika ta agrarnii biznes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioekonomika ta agrarnii biznes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/bioeconomy2020.04.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The arƟcle discusses the accounƟng treatment for intangible assets. The authors note that intangible assets are the result of economic and technological development. On this basis, the classificaƟon of economic eras according to the relaƟonship between the use of tangible and intangible assets has been considered. The arƟcle also highlights the main criteria for intangible assets, namely legal and economic. The authors note that intangible assets are a group of balance sheets, in which the intellectual resources of the new economy could be reflected. It is noted that UNAS 8 “Intangible Assets” does not contain a certain part of the secƟons that are reflected in IAS 38 “Intangible Assets”, in parƟcular, separate acquisiƟons of an asset and acquisiƟons as part of the business associaƟon, acquisiƟons through government grants, etc. AccounƟng systems and items relaƟng to intangible assets are considered. Intangible assets, and especially intellectual capital, are considered to be an important source of capital deepening in European countries, albeit with significant differences among countries. It is noted that one of the biggest challenges in accounƟng for intangible assets is their valuaƟon and, according to certain requirements of the legislaƟon, the enƟty may revalue at fair value at the balance sheet date but if there is no acƟve market, the revaluaƟon may be carried out on the basis of an expert assessment of the subject of the evaluaƟon acƟvity. The authors maintain that the presƟge or importance of intangible objects can be assessed by expert judgment, as many factors constrain the implementaƟon of the excepƟonal features or properƟes specific to these objects. The authors discussed various methods for intangible asset valuaƟon and the prioriƟes for applying expert valuaƟon approaches to intangible assets and intellectual property objects in foreign pracƟce. The arƟcle also deals with staƟsƟcal data on the value of intangible assets in the balance sheets of Ukrainian enterprises.
作为会计对象的无形资产的特征及其估值的特殊性确定
文章讨论了无形资产的会计处理。作者指出,无形资产是经济和技术发展的结果。在此基础上,根据有形资产和无形资产使用之间的关系对经济时代进行了分类。该报告还强调了无形资产的主要标准,即法律和经济标准。作者指出,无形资产是一组资产负债表,其中可以反映新经济的智力资源。需要注意的是,UNAS 8“无形资产”不包含IAS 38“无形资产》中规定的某些部分,特别是资产的单独收购和作为业务关联一部分的收购、通过政府拨款的收购等。考虑与无形资产相关的会计制度和项目。无形资产,尤其是智力资本,被认为是欧洲国家资本深化的重要来源,尽管各国之间存在显著差异。值得注意的是,无形资产核算中最大的挑战之一是其价值,根据法律的某些要求,资产可能在资产负债表日以公允价值进行重估,但如果没有活跃市场,则可以在对活跃性评估对象进行专家评估的基础上进行重估。作者坚持认为,无形物品的价值或重要性可以通过专家判断来评估,因为许多因素限制了这些物品的特殊性或特殊性的实现。作者讨论了无形资产评估的各种方法以及在外国实践中运用专家评估方法评估无形资产和知识产权客体的先验知识。该报告还涉及乌克兰企业资产负债表中无形资产价值的统计数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信