The Impact of Aging and Hand Dominance on the Passive Wrist Stiffness of Squash Players: Pilot Study

Taya Hamilton, S. Durand, H. Krebs
{"title":"The Impact of Aging and Hand Dominance on the Passive Wrist Stiffness of Squash Players: Pilot Study","authors":"Taya Hamilton, S. Durand, H. Krebs","doi":"10.2196/11670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Passive joint stiffness can influence the risk of injury and the ability to participate in sports and activities of daily living. However, little is known about how passive joint stiffness changes over time with intensive repetitive exercise, particularly when performing unilateral activities using the dominant upper limb. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the difference in passive wrist quasi-stiffness between the dominant and nondominant upper limb of competitive squash players, compare these results with a previous study on young unskilled subjects, and explore the impact of aging on wrist stiffness. Methods: A total of 7 healthy, right-side dominant male competitive squash players were recruited and examined using the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Wrist-Robot. Subjects were aged between 24 and 72 years (mean 43.7, SD 16.57) and had a mean of 20.6 years of squash playing experience (range 10-53 years, SD 13.85). Torque and displacement data were processed and applied to 2 different estimation methods, the fitting ellipse and the multiple regression method, to obtain wrist stiffness magnitude and orientation. Results: Young squash players (mean 30.75, SD 8.06 years) demonstrated a stiffer dominant wrist, with an average ratio of 1.51, compared with an average ratio of 1.18 in young unskilled subjects. The older squash players (mean 64.67, SD 6.35 years) revealed an average ratio of 0.86 (ie, the nondominant wrist was stiffer than the dominant wrist). There was a statistically significant difference between the magnitude of passive quasi-stiffness between the dominant and nondominant wrist of the young and older squash player groups (P=.004). Conclusions: Findings from this pilot study are novel and contribute to our understanding of the likely long-term effect of highly intensive, unilateral sports on wrist quasi-stiffness and the aging process: adults who participate in repetitive sporting exercise may experience greater joint quasi-stiffness when they are younger than 45 years and more flexibility when they are older than 60 years.","PeriodicalId":87288,"journal":{"name":"JMIR biomedical engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/11670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Passive joint stiffness can influence the risk of injury and the ability to participate in sports and activities of daily living. However, little is known about how passive joint stiffness changes over time with intensive repetitive exercise, particularly when performing unilateral activities using the dominant upper limb. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the difference in passive wrist quasi-stiffness between the dominant and nondominant upper limb of competitive squash players, compare these results with a previous study on young unskilled subjects, and explore the impact of aging on wrist stiffness. Methods: A total of 7 healthy, right-side dominant male competitive squash players were recruited and examined using the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Wrist-Robot. Subjects were aged between 24 and 72 years (mean 43.7, SD 16.57) and had a mean of 20.6 years of squash playing experience (range 10-53 years, SD 13.85). Torque and displacement data were processed and applied to 2 different estimation methods, the fitting ellipse and the multiple regression method, to obtain wrist stiffness magnitude and orientation. Results: Young squash players (mean 30.75, SD 8.06 years) demonstrated a stiffer dominant wrist, with an average ratio of 1.51, compared with an average ratio of 1.18 in young unskilled subjects. The older squash players (mean 64.67, SD 6.35 years) revealed an average ratio of 0.86 (ie, the nondominant wrist was stiffer than the dominant wrist). There was a statistically significant difference between the magnitude of passive quasi-stiffness between the dominant and nondominant wrist of the young and older squash player groups (P=.004). Conclusions: Findings from this pilot study are novel and contribute to our understanding of the likely long-term effect of highly intensive, unilateral sports on wrist quasi-stiffness and the aging process: adults who participate in repetitive sporting exercise may experience greater joint quasi-stiffness when they are younger than 45 years and more flexibility when they are older than 60 years.
年龄和手优势对壁球运动员被动手腕僵硬的影响:初步研究
背景:被动关节僵硬会影响受伤风险以及参与运动和日常生活的能力。然而,人们对被动关节硬度如何随着时间的推移而随着高强度重复运动而变化知之甚少,尤其是在使用优势上肢进行单侧活动时。目的:本研究旨在调查竞技壁球运动员优势上肢和非优势上肢被动手腕准刚度的差异,并将这些结果与之前对年轻非技术受试者的研究进行比较,探讨衰老对手腕刚度的影响。方法:采用麻省理工学院腕关节机器人对7名健康的右侧优势男性壁球运动员进行测试。受试者年龄在24-72岁之间(平均43.7,标准差16.57),平均有20.6年的壁球比赛经验(范围10-53年,标准差13.85)。对扭矩和位移数据进行处理,并将其应用于两种不同的估计方法,即拟合椭圆和多元回归方法,以获得手腕刚度大小和方向。结果:年轻的壁球运动员(平均30.75岁,标准差8.06岁)表现出更僵硬的优势手腕,平均比率为1.51,而年轻的非技术受试者的平均比率为1.18。年龄较大的壁球运动员(平均64.67岁,标准差6.35岁)的平均比率为0.86(即,非优势腕关节比优势腕关节更硬)。年轻和老年壁球运动员组的优势和非优势手腕之间的被动准僵硬程度存在统计学上的显著差异(P=.004)。结论:这项初步研究的发现是新颖的,有助于我们理解高强度、,单侧运动对手腕准僵硬和衰老过程的影响:参加重复运动的成年人在45岁以下时可能会经历更大的关节准僵硬,在60岁以上时可能会体验到更大的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信