Ecological signals of arctic plant-microbe associations are consistent across eDNA and vegetation surveys

Bastien Parisy, N. Schmidt, Helena Wirta, Lærke Stewart, L. Pellissier, W. Holben, Samuel B Pannoni, P. Somervuo, Mirkka M. Jones, J. Siren, E. Vesterinen, O. Ovaskainen, T. Roslin
{"title":"Ecological signals of arctic plant-microbe associations are consistent across eDNA and vegetation surveys","authors":"Bastien Parisy, N. Schmidt, Helena Wirta, Lærke Stewart, L. Pellissier, W. Holben, Samuel B Pannoni, P. Somervuo, Mirkka M. Jones, J. Siren, E. Vesterinen, O. Ovaskainen, T. Roslin","doi":"10.3897/mbmg.7.99979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding how different taxa respond to abiotic characteristics of the environment is of key interest for understanding the assembly of communities. Yet, whether eDNA data will suffice to accurately capture environmental imprints has been the topic of some debate. In this study, we characterised patterns of species occurrences and co-occurrences in Zackenberg in northeast Greenland using environmental DNA. To explore the potential for extracting ecological signals from eDNA data alone, we compared two approaches (visual vegetation surveys and soil eDNA metabarcoding) to describing plant communities and their responses to abiotic conditions. We then examined plant associations with microbes using a joint species distribution model. We found that most (68%) of plant genera were detectable by both vegetation surveys and eDNA signatures. Species-specific occurrence data revealed how plants, bacteria and fungi responded to their abiotic environment – with plants, bacteria and fungi all responding similarly to soil moisture. Nonetheless, a large proportion of fungi decreased in occurrences with increasing soil temperature. Regarding biotic associations, the nature and proportion of the plant-microbe associations detected were consistent between plant data identified via vegetation surveys and eDNA. Of pairs of plants and microbe genera showing statistically supported associations (while accounting for joint responses to the environment), plants and bacteria mainly showed negative associations, whereas plants and fungi mainly showed positive associations. Ample ecological signals detected by both vegetation surveys and by eDNA-based methods and a general correspondence in biotic associations inferred by both methods, suggested that purely eDNA-based approaches constitute a promising and easily applicable tool for studying plant-soil microbial associations in the Arctic and elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":18374,"journal":{"name":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.7.99979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how different taxa respond to abiotic characteristics of the environment is of key interest for understanding the assembly of communities. Yet, whether eDNA data will suffice to accurately capture environmental imprints has been the topic of some debate. In this study, we characterised patterns of species occurrences and co-occurrences in Zackenberg in northeast Greenland using environmental DNA. To explore the potential for extracting ecological signals from eDNA data alone, we compared two approaches (visual vegetation surveys and soil eDNA metabarcoding) to describing plant communities and their responses to abiotic conditions. We then examined plant associations with microbes using a joint species distribution model. We found that most (68%) of plant genera were detectable by both vegetation surveys and eDNA signatures. Species-specific occurrence data revealed how plants, bacteria and fungi responded to their abiotic environment – with plants, bacteria and fungi all responding similarly to soil moisture. Nonetheless, a large proportion of fungi decreased in occurrences with increasing soil temperature. Regarding biotic associations, the nature and proportion of the plant-microbe associations detected were consistent between plant data identified via vegetation surveys and eDNA. Of pairs of plants and microbe genera showing statistically supported associations (while accounting for joint responses to the environment), plants and bacteria mainly showed negative associations, whereas plants and fungi mainly showed positive associations. Ample ecological signals detected by both vegetation surveys and by eDNA-based methods and a general correspondence in biotic associations inferred by both methods, suggested that purely eDNA-based approaches constitute a promising and easily applicable tool for studying plant-soil microbial associations in the Arctic and elsewhere.
在eDNA和植被调查中,北极植物-微生物协会的生态信号是一致的
了解不同的分类群如何响应环境的非生物特征是理解群落聚集的关键。然而,eDNA数据是否足以准确捕捉环境印记一直是一些争论的话题。在这项研究中,我们利用环境DNA特征了格陵兰岛东北部扎肯伯格地区物种发生和共同发生的模式。为了探索仅从eDNA数据中提取生态信号的潜力,我们比较了两种方法(视觉植被调查和土壤eDNA元条形码)来描述植物群落及其对非生物条件的响应。然后,我们使用联合物种分布模型检查了植物与微生物的关联。我们发现大多数(68%)的植物属都可以通过植被调查和eDNA特征检测到。物种特异性发生数据揭示了植物、细菌和真菌如何对其非生物环境做出反应——植物、细菌和真菌对土壤湿度的反应都相似。然而,随着土壤温度的升高,大部分真菌的出现次数减少。在生物关联方面,植物-微生物关联的性质和比例在通过植被调查和eDNA鉴定的植物数据之间是一致的。在统计上支持关联的植物和微生物属对(同时考虑对环境的共同响应)中,植物和细菌主要表现为负相关,而植物和真菌主要表现为正相关。植被调查和基于edna的方法检测到的大量生态信号以及两种方法推断的生物关联的一般对应关系表明,纯基于edna的方法是研究北极和其他地区植物-土壤微生物关联的一种有前途且易于应用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信