Legal Methods for the Study of EU Institutional Practice

IF 1.6 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Constitutional Law Review Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1017/S157401962200044X

B. de Witte

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Methodological choices in the legal study of the role of EU institutions – The so-called doctrinal legal method is appropriate, provided that it includes the analysis of key elements of non-legal institutional practice – Simple distinction between the study of ‘law in the books’ and that of ‘law in action’ to be qualified – Doctrinal legal scholarship is meaningful only when it acknowledges and incorporates a certain amount of ‘law in action’

查看原文本刊更多论文

欧盟制度实践研究的法律方法

欧盟机构作用法律研究的方法选择——所谓的理论法律方法是合适的，只要它包括对非法律制度实践的关键要素的分析——对“书本上的法律”和“行动中的法律”的研究之间的简单区别——只有当它承认并结合了一定数量的“行动中法律”时，理论法律学术才有意义

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Constitutional Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.