Accuracy of Cone Beam CT Measurements for Assessment of Posterior Mandible: A Cadaver Study

Izzati Nabilah Ismail, Mohammad Aizuddin Abu Bakar, Khairul Fikri Hairul Anuar, Mohamad Arif Mohd Ramlee
{"title":"Accuracy of Cone Beam CT Measurements for Assessment of Posterior Mandible: A Cadaver Study","authors":"Izzati Nabilah Ismail, Mohammad Aizuddin Abu Bakar, Khairul Fikri Hairul Anuar, Mohamad Arif Mohd Ramlee","doi":"10.18502/jcr.v8i2.7642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study is aimed at analysing the accuracy and reliability of the cone beam CT (CBCT) measurements and direct physical measurements of the posterior mandible. \nMaterials and methods: Eighteen cadaveric hemi-mandibles were dissected from the soft tissues and the CBCT images of the mandibles were taken. Direct physical and cone beam CT measurements of six landmarks which includes height of ramus (R), distance of lingula to sigmoid notch (LS), distance of lingula to inferior border (LI), position of lingula in relation to occlusal plane (L-OP),  ramus thickness at crestal level (RT-C), and ramus thickness at midway between sigmoid notch and lingula (RT-M) were determined. Accuracy and reliability of the measurements were tested. \nResults: Four landmarks showed high accuracy when measuring the posterior mandible, while two landmarks, LI and RT-M, showed statistically significant weaker accuracy (p<0.05). Inter-reliability were good for all landmarks when measured directly physically on mandibles (ICC>0.7 and p>0.05), but were low on two landmarks, LI and RT-C, on CBCT measurement (ICC<0.5 and p<0.05). \nConclusion: A generally strong accuracy between direct physical and CBCT measurements for most landmarks on posterior mandible were found. Reliability between two researchers were high on direct physical measurements. Meanwhile, two landmarks on CBCT which include LI and RT-C showed low inter-reliability. Hence, CBCT measurements proved to be a good tool for pre-operative assessment, since high inter-reliability and strong accuracy corresponding to direct physical were recorded.","PeriodicalId":52622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jcr.v8i2.7642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study is aimed at analysing the accuracy and reliability of the cone beam CT (CBCT) measurements and direct physical measurements of the posterior mandible. Materials and methods: Eighteen cadaveric hemi-mandibles were dissected from the soft tissues and the CBCT images of the mandibles were taken. Direct physical and cone beam CT measurements of six landmarks which includes height of ramus (R), distance of lingula to sigmoid notch (LS), distance of lingula to inferior border (LI), position of lingula in relation to occlusal plane (L-OP),  ramus thickness at crestal level (RT-C), and ramus thickness at midway between sigmoid notch and lingula (RT-M) were determined. Accuracy and reliability of the measurements were tested. Results: Four landmarks showed high accuracy when measuring the posterior mandible, while two landmarks, LI and RT-M, showed statistically significant weaker accuracy (p<0.05). Inter-reliability were good for all landmarks when measured directly physically on mandibles (ICC>0.7 and p>0.05), but were low on two landmarks, LI and RT-C, on CBCT measurement (ICC<0.5 and p<0.05). Conclusion: A generally strong accuracy between direct physical and CBCT measurements for most landmarks on posterior mandible were found. Reliability between two researchers were high on direct physical measurements. Meanwhile, two landmarks on CBCT which include LI and RT-C showed low inter-reliability. Hence, CBCT measurements proved to be a good tool for pre-operative assessment, since high inter-reliability and strong accuracy corresponding to direct physical were recorded.
后下颌骨锥束CT测量的准确性评估:一项尸体研究
目的:本研究旨在分析锥形束CT (CBCT)测量和直接物理测量后颌骨的准确性和可靠性。材料与方法:对18具尸体半下颌骨进行软组织解剖,并拍摄下颌骨的CBCT图像。直接物理和锥束CT测量6个标志,包括分支高度(R)、舌到乙状窦切迹距离(LS)、舌到下边界距离(LI)、舌相对于咬合面位置(L-OP)、嵴面分支厚度(RT-C)、乙状窦切迹与舌间分支厚度(RT-M)。测试了测量的准确性和可靠性。结果:4个指标在测量后颌骨时准确度较高,而LI和RT-M两个指标的准确度较低(p < 0.7和p<0.05),而LI和RT-C两个指标在CBCT测量时准确度较低(ICC<0.5和p<0.05)。结论:直接物理测量和CBCT测量对大多数后下颌标志的准确性普遍较高。两位研究人员在直接物理测量上的可靠性很高。同时,CBCT上LI和RT-C两个标志的互信度较低。因此,CBCT测量被证明是术前评估的一个很好的工具,因为记录了高相互可靠性和高准确性对应于直接物理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信