Effects of fragmentation on production at Peak mine Midlands, Zimbabwe

Q4 Engineering
Frank Kwachara Ngoroyemoto Tapiwa, Sabao Ashley Ruvimbo, R. Verma, Tsidzinye Tafadzwa, Nyamagudza Tatenda, Suglo S. Raymond
{"title":"Effects of fragmentation on production at Peak mine Midlands, Zimbabwe","authors":"Frank Kwachara Ngoroyemoto Tapiwa, Sabao Ashley Ruvimbo, R. Verma, Tsidzinye Tafadzwa, Nyamagudza Tatenda, Suglo S. Raymond","doi":"10.25303/1608da028038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, the cost of production at Peak Mine Midlands, Zimbabwe, has been high due to oversized rock fragments. This led to increased mining costs far above what was planned by the mine. Initial investigations showed that valuable production hours were lost in trying to deal with the oversized rock fragments at the draw points. This study was conducted at Peak Mine Midlands, Zimbabwe, on 1210 level. The methods used to assess the effects of fragmentation on production at the mine included visual assessment, analysis of the drill and blasting costs of the production data, 2D image analysis, sieve analysis, time and motion studies, analysis of the explosive’s consumption, mining blasting trials and post-mine blast experiments. The results show that the current ring hole designs used in the sublevel open stopes at Peak Mine do not give optimal particle size distribution after the primary blasts as the sieve analyses show that 50% of the sizes of materials at the draw points are larger than 1,000 mm. While 4 secondary blasts were budgeted per shift to reduce the sizes of the boulders to sizes that will pass through the grizzly’s sieves, 7 secondary blasts were done per shift and this led to about 75% increase in the cost of explosives consumed by the mine. The results also show that 35.96 minutes of production time were lost on each secondary blast conducted. Four trial blasts conducted on different ring hole patterns show that ring #1 which has a burden of 1.2 m instead of 1.8 m in the other ring holes led to a significant reduction in drilling and blasting costs from USD $33.79 in trial #4 (the control case) to $28.80 in trial #1. The sieve analyses also show that the optimal fragment sizes from primary blasts are in the range of X = +200 mm and X = +300 mm. So, the designed ring hole patterns in the sublevel open stopes should produce particles with sizes in the range of  150 mm and  +350 mm from the primary blasts.","PeriodicalId":50576,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25303/1608da028038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the years, the cost of production at Peak Mine Midlands, Zimbabwe, has been high due to oversized rock fragments. This led to increased mining costs far above what was planned by the mine. Initial investigations showed that valuable production hours were lost in trying to deal with the oversized rock fragments at the draw points. This study was conducted at Peak Mine Midlands, Zimbabwe, on 1210 level. The methods used to assess the effects of fragmentation on production at the mine included visual assessment, analysis of the drill and blasting costs of the production data, 2D image analysis, sieve analysis, time and motion studies, analysis of the explosive’s consumption, mining blasting trials and post-mine blast experiments. The results show that the current ring hole designs used in the sublevel open stopes at Peak Mine do not give optimal particle size distribution after the primary blasts as the sieve analyses show that 50% of the sizes of materials at the draw points are larger than 1,000 mm. While 4 secondary blasts were budgeted per shift to reduce the sizes of the boulders to sizes that will pass through the grizzly’s sieves, 7 secondary blasts were done per shift and this led to about 75% increase in the cost of explosives consumed by the mine. The results also show that 35.96 minutes of production time were lost on each secondary blast conducted. Four trial blasts conducted on different ring hole patterns show that ring #1 which has a burden of 1.2 m instead of 1.8 m in the other ring holes led to a significant reduction in drilling and blasting costs from USD $33.79 in trial #4 (the control case) to $28.80 in trial #1. The sieve analyses also show that the optimal fragment sizes from primary blasts are in the range of X = +200 mm and X = +300 mm. So, the designed ring hole patterns in the sublevel open stopes should produce particles with sizes in the range of  150 mm and  +350 mm from the primary blasts.
碎片化对津巴布韦米德兰兹峰矿生产的影响
多年来,由于岩石碎片过大,津巴布韦中部匹克矿的生产成本一直很高。这导致采矿成本的增加远远超过了矿山的计划。初步调查显示,在处理提取点的超大岩石碎片时,损失了宝贵的生产时间。这项研究是在津巴布韦中部匹克煤矿1210层进行的。用于评估破碎对矿山生产影响的方法包括视觉评估、生产数据的钻孔和爆破成本分析、2D图像分析、筛分分析、时间和运动研究、炸药消耗分析、采矿爆破试验和矿山后爆破实验。结果表明,匹克矿分段露天采场目前使用的环孔设计在初次爆破后并没有给出最佳的粒度分布,因为筛分分析表明,50%的材料在拉制点的粒度大于1000mm。虽然每班预算进行4次二次爆破,以将巨石的尺寸减小到可以通过灰熊筛的尺寸,但每班进行7次二次爆炸,这导致矿山消耗的炸药成本增加了约75%。结果还表明,每次进行二次爆破损失了35.96分钟的生产时间。在不同环孔模式上进行的四次试爆表明,环#1的荷载为1.2米,而不是其他环孔中的1.8米,从而显著降低了钻孔和爆破成本,从试验#4中的33.79美元(对照案例)降至试验#1中的28.80美元。筛分分析还表明,初次爆破的最佳碎片尺寸在X=+200mm和X=+300mm范围内。因此,分段露天采场设计的环孔模式应产生尺寸在 150毫米和 +距离初次爆破350mm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disaster Advances
Disaster Advances 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信