Assessing a Consortium for a Multidisciplinary Subject

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Collection Management Pub Date : 2020-04-13 DOI:10.1080/01462679.2020.1750522

Sue F. Phelps

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper reports on a study to assess the Orbis Cascade Alliance’s print collection for material supporting the Black experience. It covers descriptions of general methods used for collection assessment as well as those used to assess the Alliance including Brief Tests, List Checking, and Comparison Studies. Each method is described with its strengths and weaknesses as well as their application to a consortium of libraries with Black experience being the subject matter of the material collected. These methods can be used for other multidisciplinary topics. Issues with subject headings, publishing, acquisitions, and racism emerged during the study and are covered in the discussion.

查看原文本刊更多论文

评估一个多学科的联合体

摘要本文报告了一项研究，以评估奥比斯喀斯喀特联盟的印刷品收集材料支持黑人的经历。它涵盖了用于收集评估的一般方法的描述，以及用于评估联盟的方法，包括简短测试、清单检查和比较研究。每种方法都描述了其优点和缺点，以及它们在以黑人经验为主题的图书馆联盟中的应用。这些方法可用于其他多学科课题。主题标题、出版、收购和种族主义等问题在研究过程中出现，并在讨论中讨论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Collection Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

44.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The management and development of library collections is constantly evolving. Collection Management is the essential refereed quarterly journal that presents practical, research-based information about building, administering, preserving, assessing, and organizing library collections. The journal offers library professionals of all types crucial guidance in the fast-changing field of collection management, including the latest developments in sharing and providing access to resources, creating digital collections, preserving both traditional and digital library resources, applying technological developments to managing collections, training and developing staff.