Attention: Thomas A. Clark and Simone Weil

IF 0.2 0 POETRY
Simone Kotva
{"title":"Attention: Thomas A. Clark and Simone Weil","authors":"Simone Kotva","doi":"10.16995/BIP.732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay studies the connection between attention and redemption in the poetry of Thomas A. Clark. It discusses the possibility of using Simone Weil’s religious philosophy to interpret Clark’s understanding of attention as ‘waiting’. It argues that while there are affinities between Clark and Weil, Clark’s poetic practice also reveals a resistance to the ascetic extremes which attention assumes in Weil’s philosophy. To think through the difference between attention as method and style, the essay then draws on the failures of Descartes’ Meditations in order to argue that only a practical, that is to say, stylistic, engagement with attention will allow for the radical attention that Weil sought but could not achieve.","PeriodicalId":40210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of British and Irish Innovative Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of British and Irish Innovative Poetry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/BIP.732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This essay studies the connection between attention and redemption in the poetry of Thomas A. Clark. It discusses the possibility of using Simone Weil’s religious philosophy to interpret Clark’s understanding of attention as ‘waiting’. It argues that while there are affinities between Clark and Weil, Clark’s poetic practice also reveals a resistance to the ascetic extremes which attention assumes in Weil’s philosophy. To think through the difference between attention as method and style, the essay then draws on the failures of Descartes’ Meditations in order to argue that only a practical, that is to say, stylistic, engagement with attention will allow for the radical attention that Weil sought but could not achieve.
收件人:Thomas A.Clark和Simone Weil
本文研究了托马斯·a·克拉克诗歌中关注与救赎的关系。讨论了用西蒙娜·韦尔的宗教哲学来解释克拉克对注意力的理解为“等待”的可能性。本文认为,虽然克拉克与韦尔之间存在着相似之处,但克拉克的诗歌实践也揭示了一种对韦尔哲学中关注的禁欲主义极端的抵制。为了思考注意力作为方法和风格之间的区别,这篇文章接着借鉴了笛卡尔《沉思记》的失败,以证明只有一种实用的,也就是说,风格上的,与注意力的接触,才会允许韦尔寻求但无法实现的激进注意力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信