Conflicting commemorations: past and present in confederate memorialization

IF 0.8 4区管理学 Q1 HISTORY

Management & Organizational History Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI:10.1080/17449359.2018.1525406

B. Hahn

引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT How do collective memory and memorialization work in divided societies? This essay takes present-day conflicts over Civil War memorialization as an opportunity to explore linkages between historical interpretations of the causes of the Civil War, attitudes toward Confederate memorials (and their removal), and modern political identities. It provides three cases of collective memorialization in one community – the college town of Chapel Hill, North Carolina – to shed light on physical commemoration and its possibility to invite discussion of the American racial history and the history of slavery.

查看原文本刊更多论文

相互冲突的纪念:联邦纪念的过去和现在

在分裂的社会中，集体记忆和纪念是如何起作用的?本文以当前围绕内战纪念的冲突为契机，探讨了对内战起因的历史解释、对邦联纪念碑(及其拆除)的态度以及现代政治身份之间的联系。它提供了在一个社区——北卡罗莱纳州教堂山大学城——进行集体纪念的三个案例，以阐明实物纪念及其引发对美国种族历史和奴隶制历史讨论的可能性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Management & Organizational History Multiple-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.