FAR-RIGHT DIGITAL ACTIVISM DURING AND BEYOND THE PANDEMIC

Sabine Volk
{"title":"FAR-RIGHT DIGITAL ACTIVISM DURING AND BEYOND THE PANDEMIC","authors":"Sabine Volk","doi":"10.23858/ethp.2022.43.3001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While digital activism has formed part of social movements’ contentious repertoires for at least two decades, online forms of protest have risen to unprecedented importance across the globe in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This article studies continuities and shifts in digital activism before, during and beyond the pandemic, drawing from a case study conducted of the Dresden-based far-right social movement organisation PEGIDA. Seeking to shed new light on the role of the internet and social media for sustained far-right mobilisation, I explore long-term trends in PEGIDA’s digital activism since its emergence in 2014. To this aim, I draw from an original patchwork ethnographic dataset generated through participant observation of demonstrations in Dresden and digital ethnography in 2019-21 as well as undertaking a thorough literature review. The empirical analysis indicates three key findings: Firstly, the longitudinal perspective reveals that a social movement actor’s digital practices are not bound to one or a few ideal-types, but highly dynamic over time. Secondly, my interpretive-ethnographic lens emphasises the constitutive dimensions of digital activism. Thirdly, the analytical focus on digital activism during the pandemic adds new insights into the relationship between the online and offline worlds of mobilisation. As a whole, this article underscores some of the key advantages of (patchwork) ethnography in relation to other methods in protest research.","PeriodicalId":34666,"journal":{"name":"Ethnologia Polona","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnologia Polona","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23858/ethp.2022.43.3001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While digital activism has formed part of social movements’ contentious repertoires for at least two decades, online forms of protest have risen to unprecedented importance across the globe in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This article studies continuities and shifts in digital activism before, during and beyond the pandemic, drawing from a case study conducted of the Dresden-based far-right social movement organisation PEGIDA. Seeking to shed new light on the role of the internet and social media for sustained far-right mobilisation, I explore long-term trends in PEGIDA’s digital activism since its emergence in 2014. To this aim, I draw from an original patchwork ethnographic dataset generated through participant observation of demonstrations in Dresden and digital ethnography in 2019-21 as well as undertaking a thorough literature review. The empirical analysis indicates three key findings: Firstly, the longitudinal perspective reveals that a social movement actor’s digital practices are not bound to one or a few ideal-types, but highly dynamic over time. Secondly, my interpretive-ethnographic lens emphasises the constitutive dimensions of digital activism. Thirdly, the analytical focus on digital activism during the pandemic adds new insights into the relationship between the online and offline worlds of mobilisation. As a whole, this article underscores some of the key advantages of (patchwork) ethnography in relation to other methods in protest research.
疫情期间及之后的极右翼数字激进主义
尽管至少20年来,数字激进主义已经成为社会运动有争议的曲目的一部分,但在新冠肺炎大流行的背景下,在线形式的抗议在全球范围内变得前所未有的重要。本文借鉴总部位于德累斯顿的极右翼社会运动组织PEGIDA的案例研究,研究了疫情之前、期间和之后数字激进主义的持续性和转变。为了揭示互联网和社交媒体在持续的极右翼动员中的作用,我探索了PEGIDA自2014年出现以来数字激进主义的长期趋势。为此,我借鉴了一个原始的拼凑民族志数据集,该数据集是通过参与者观察2019-21年德累斯顿的示威活动和数字民族志以及进行彻底的文献综述而生成的。实证分析表明了三个关键发现:首先,纵向视角表明,社会运动参与者的数字实践并不局限于一种或几种理想类型,而是随着时间的推移而高度动态的。其次,我的解释性民族志镜头强调了数字激进主义的构成维度。第三,对疫情期间数字行动主义的分析关注为动员的线上和线下世界之间的关系提供了新的见解。总的来说,这篇文章强调了(拼凑的)民族志在抗议研究中相对于其他方法的一些关键优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信